- From: Rob Sanderson via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 21:26:56 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
Even if the site uses 200 style conneg, it's behaving badly if it doesn't put the URI for .sv in to the Content-Location header. If it doesn't, and the conneg is completely silent ... there's nothing we can do to get the content back anyway as it's basically just [cloaking](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloaking). -- GitHub Notification of comment by azaroth42 Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/220#issuecomment-221101396 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 23 May 2016 21:26:58 UTC