- From: gsergiu via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 08:22:56 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
@r12a .. just to conclude the analysis, not the solution .. I would like to ask the following question: Are the language + script codes (e.g. az-Arab | az-Cyrl | az-Latn) sufficient for correct representation of the text, including the font selection and the direction of the text? (if yes ... than the main question of this issue, turns into: Do we need redundandancy for easier processing of the annotations? ) (here some references for others that want to provide feedback: Script codes: http://unicode.org/iso15924/iso15924-codes.html i18n QA: http://www.i18nguy.com/temp/rtl.html W3C i18n script subtag recommendations: https://www.w3.org/International/articles/language-tags/#script IANA subtag registry: http://www.iana.org/assignments/language-subtag-registry/language-subtag-registry W3C i18n recommendations on language tags: https://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-choosing-language-tags ) -- GitHub Notification of comment by gsergiu Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/224#issuecomment-221505647 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 25 May 2016 08:23:01 UTC