- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 04:09:50 +0200
- To: TB Dinesh <dinesh@servelots.com>
- Cc: W3C Public Annotation List <public-annotation@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 17 May 2016 02:10:01 UTC
I must admit I do not see the relationship with EME or the EFF's proposal Ivan > On 16 May 2016, at 22:00, TB Dinesh <dinesh@servelots.com> wrote: > > I came across this, and wonder about restrictions on Web Annotation provisions. > As according to the article, EME is a precursor to 3rd parties bringing > restrictions on user agent behavior. > > https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2016/05/open-letter-members-w3c-advisory-committee <https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2016/05/open-letter-members-w3c-advisory-committee> > > ... > e.g., > if the W3C defines a data-type, anyone can make a user-agent that can receive and render that data. The people designing user agents might do things that the people running the servers disapprove of (for example, blocking pop-up ads), but that's not illegal -- so long as you don't break the law, the company serving the data can't dictate how the companies making the clients must handle it. ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Digital Publishing Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0782-2704
Received on Tuesday, 17 May 2016 02:10:01 UTC