- From: gsergiu via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 10:55:56 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
correct, given that we have a list of languages provided by the annotation creator, why do we need a "default processing language"? Isn't this the responsability of the clients to decide which of the given languages should/can be used by the **NLP algorithms which are known only by the client**? I don't think that the annotation creator should **normatively** enforce a processing language .. (in any case, including the 1 language scenario). -- GitHub Notification of comment by gsergiu Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/213#issuecomment-221539653 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 25 May 2016 10:56:00 UTC