- From: r12a via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 12:44:50 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
(this is not an i18n WG response) The i18n WG actually discussed this some time ago and concluded that the web annotation spec doesn't imply any particular processing of resource identifiers that could be called IRIs/URLs that would involve things like punycode and percent-escaping. Rather, we concluded that those processes would be run by implementations using the model, and that the name was chosen simply to indicate (per the RDFa explanation quoted above) that the resource identifiers permit the use of characters outside those of plain ASCII. If those assumptions are correct, and as long as the spec states that resource identifiers permit the use of characters outside those of plain ASCII, I don't think we were overly concerned about what you call them. -- GitHub Notification of comment by r12a Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/241#issuecomment-222136919 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 27 May 2016 12:44:51 UTC