- From: Sarven Capadisli via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 15:59:49 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
@azaroth42 That's interesting to explore, however I think that might put additional stress (requirement?) on normalisation of the data. If HTML is used, they'll go with `lang="en"` and XHTML would with `xml:lang="en"` and perhaps Polygloth would need to do both. This is on top of: perhaps `rdf:HTML` and `rdf:XMLLiteral` blocks should not be preserved as such. Same goes for the direction. There is a tradeoff somewhere :) I have some preference to: "don't touch the source" but "enrich" via adding language and direction to the annotation. I realise that comes across a bit clumsy. -- GitHub Notification of comment by csarven Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/224#issuecomment-219765352 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 17 May 2016 15:59:50 UTC