- From: asmusf via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 09 May 2016 15:51:50 +0000
- To: public-annotation@w3.org
The language SHOULD is usually interpreted as "do something different at your peril". The MAY language means that there isn't a formal requirement for any specific number. So, there's nothing wrong with the language from the formal perspective. The suggested "read better" would not be an editorial change. The second proposed alternative is even worse, because it makes it equally recommended to have no language associated. The example given before is an mp3 file. What if the file contains a text followed by its interpretation? That would seem to be a case where associating it with a single language may not be the best alternative. -- GitHub Notification of comment by asmusf Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/213#issuecomment-217904993 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 9 May 2016 15:53:45 UTC