ietf-http-wg@w3.org from January to March 2007 by thread

Section 13 Mark Nottingham (Friday, 30 March)

pipelined client/server behaviour Adrian Chadd (Wednesday, 28 March)

• RE: pipelined client/server behaviour Eric Lawrence (Wednesday, 28 March)
  • Re: pipelined client/server behaviour Adrian Chadd (Saturday, 31 March)
    • Re: pipelined client/server behaviour Yngve N. Pettersen (Developer Opera Software ASA) (Saturday, 31 March)

HTTP Vocabulary in RDF Julian Reschke (Saturday, 24 March)

Escaping <\> in HTTP Digest (RFC 2617) Alexey Melnikov (Saturday, 17 March)

• Re: Escaping <\> in HTTP Digest (RFC 2617) Henrik Nordstrom (Tuesday, 20 March)
  • Re: Escaping <\> in HTTP Digest (RFC 2617) Henrik Nordstrom (Tuesday, 20 March)
• RE: Escaping <\> in HTTP Digest (RFC 2617) Eric Lawrence (Friday, 23 March)
  • RE: Escaping <\> in HTTP Digest (RFC 2617) Eric Lawrence (Friday, 23 March)
    • RE: Escaping <\> in HTTP Digest (RFC 2617) Henrik Nordstrom (Sunday, 25 March)
  • RE: Escaping <\> in HTTP Digest (RFC 2617) Scott Lawrence (Friday, 23 March)
    • RE: Escaping <\> in HTTP Digest (RFC 2617) Henrik Nordstrom (Sunday, 25 March)

Thought on ABNF upgrade Julian Reschke (Saturday, 17 March)

• Re: Thought on ABNF upgrade Bjoern Hoehrmann (Saturday, 17 March)
• Re: Thought on ABNF upgrade Henrik Nordstrom (Tuesday, 20 March)

New Status Code -- 2xx Greedy Hotel? Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 15 March)

• Re: New Status Code -- 2xx Greedy Hotel? Thomas Roessler (Thursday, 15 March)
  • Re: New Status Code -- 2xx Greedy Hotel? Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: New Status Code -- 2xx Greedy Hotel? Stefan Eissing (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: New Status Code -- 2xx Greedy Hotel? Bjoern Hoehrmann (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: New Status Code -- 2xx Greedy Hotel? Joe Orton (Thursday, 15 March)
• Re: New Status Code -- 2xx Greedy Hotel? Mark Baker (Thursday, 15 March)
  • Re: New Status Code -- 2xx Greedy Hotel? Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 15 March)
    • Re: New Status Code -- 2xx Greedy Hotel? Stefan Eissing (Thursday, 15 March)
    • Re: New Status Code -- 2xx Greedy Hotel? Nicholas Shanks (Thursday, 15 March)
      • Re: New Status Code -- 2xx Greedy Hotel? Adrien de Croy (Thursday, 15 March)
        • Re: New Status Code -- 2xx Greedy Hotel? Adrien de Croy (Thursday, 15 March)
        • Re: New Status Code -- 2xx Greedy Hotel? Henrik Nordstrom (Friday, 16 March)
• RE: New Status Code -- 2xx Greedy Hotel? Eric Lawrence (Thursday, 15 March)
  • Re: New Status Code -- 2xx Greedy Hotel? Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 15 March)
    • RE: New Status Code -- 2xx Greedy Hotel? Eric Lawrence (Thursday, 15 March)
      • RE: New Status Code -- 2xx Greedy Hotel? Larry Masinter (Thursday, 15 March)
    • Re: New Status Code -- 2xx Greedy Hotel? David Morris (Thursday, 15 March)

Programa de Intercambio Clínico: Presente sus Casos Críticos a sus Colegas Junta Médica Virtual (Friday, 9 March)

HTTP Request Forwarding? Mike Schinkel (Thursday, 8 March)

• Re: HTTP Request Forwarding? Adrien de Croy (Thursday, 8 March)
  • RE: HTTP Request Forwarding? Mike Schinkel (Thursday, 8 March)
    • Re: HTTP Request Forwarding? Travis Snoozy (Thursday, 8 March)
      • RE: HTTP Request Forwarding? Mike Schinkel (Thursday, 8 March)

Straw-man charter Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 6 March)

• Re: Straw-man charter Bjoern Hoehrmann (Tuesday, 6 March)
  • Re: Straw-man charter Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 6 March)
  • Re: Straw-man charter Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Straw-man charter Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 6 March)
  • Re: Straw-man charter Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Straw-man charter Anne van Kesteren (Tuesday, 6 March)
  • Re: Straw-man charter Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 6 March)
    • Re: Straw-man charter Anne van Kesteren (Tuesday, 6 March)
      • Re: Straw-man charter Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 6 March)
        • Re: Removing Content-Location Henrik Nordstrom (Wednesday, 7 March)
        • Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET Henrik Nordstrom (Wednesday, 7 March)
          • Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET Anne van Kesteren (Wednesday, 7 March)
            • Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET Henrik Nordstrom (Wednesday, 7 March)
            • RE: Redirection of a POST as a GET Eric Lawrence (Thursday, 8 March)
            • Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET Adrien de Croy (Thursday, 8 March)
            • RE: Redirection of a POST as a GET Mike Schinkel (Thursday, 8 March)
            • Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET Adrien de Croy (Thursday, 8 March)
            • RE: Redirection of a POST as a GET Mike Schinkel (Thursday, 8 March)
            • RE: Redirection of a POST as a GET Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 8 March)
            • RE: Redirection of a POST as a GET Mike Schinkel (Saturday, 10 March)
            • Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET Julian Reschke (Thursday, 8 March)
            • Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET Adrien de Croy (Thursday, 8 March)
            • Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 8 March)
            • Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 8 March)
            • Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET Asbjørn Ulsberg (Monday, 12 March)
            • Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET Anne van Kesteren (Thursday, 8 March)
            • Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET Julian Reschke (Thursday, 8 March)
            • Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET Adrien de Croy (Thursday, 8 March)
            • Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET Julian Reschke (Thursday, 8 March)
            • RE: Redirection of a POST as a GET Eric Lawrence (Thursday, 8 March)
            • Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET David Morris (Thursday, 8 March)
            • Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET David Morris (Thursday, 8 March)
            • RE: Redirection of a POST as a GET Eric Lawrence (Thursday, 8 March)
            • RE: Redirection of a POST as a GET David Morris (Thursday, 8 March)
            • RE: Redirection of a POST as a GET Mike Schinkel (Thursday, 8 March)
            • Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET Julian Reschke (Thursday, 8 March)
            • RE: Redirection of a POST as a GET Mike Schinkel (Friday, 9 March)
            • Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 8 March)
            • Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET Adrien de Croy (Thursday, 8 March)
            • Re: Redirection of a POST as a GET Roy T. Fielding (Friday, 9 March)
            • RE: Redirection of a POST as a GET Eric Lawrence (Friday, 9 March)
• RE: Straw-man charter Larry Masinter (Tuesday, 6 March)
  • Re: Straw-man charter Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 6 March)
  • Re: Straw-man charter Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Straw-man charter Jeffrey Mogul (Tuesday, 6 March)
  • Re: Straw-man charter Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 7 March)
    • Re: Straw-man charter Henrik Nordstrom (Wednesday, 7 March)
• Re: Straw-man charter Justin Erenkrantz (Tuesday, 6 March)
• Re: Straw-man charter Robert Sayre (Thursday, 8 March)
  • Re: Straw-man charter Julian Reschke (Thursday, 8 March)
    • Re: Straw-man charter Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 8 March)
      • RE: Straw-man charter Larry Masinter (Thursday, 8 March)

Informal get-together in Prague - Details Mark Nottingham (Monday, 5 March)

• Re: Informal get-together in Prague - Details Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 6 March)

products in Server header field Nicolas Krebs (Thursday, 1 March)

• Re: products in Server header field Henrik Nordstrom (Friday, 2 March)
  • Re: products in Server header field David Morris (Friday, 2 March)
    • Re: products in Server header field Justin Erenkrantz (Tuesday, 6 March)

Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-pettersen-cache-context-00.txt Yngve N. Pettersen (Developer Opera Software ASA) (Wednesday, 28 February)

Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-http-stale-while-revalidate-00.txt Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 20 February)

Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-nottingham-http-stale-if-error-00.txt Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 20 February)

Fwd: [Standards-discuss] [HTML in email] Lisa Dusseault (Monday, 19 February)

• Re: Fwd: [Standards-discuss] [HTML in email] Keith Moore (Wednesday, 21 February)
  • Re: Fwd: [Standards-discuss] [HTML in email] Anne van Kesteren (Wednesday, 21 February)
  • Re: Fwd: [Standards-discuss] [HTML in email] Keith Moore (Wednesday, 21 February)

Call for Submissions: ICIMP 2007 & ICDT 2007 & ICGD&BC 2007, Silicon Valley, July 1-6, 2007 Dr. Reda (Tuesday, 13 February)

Re: Extension to HTTP : TimeZone David Thielen (Sunday, 11 February)

Updating Entity Headers with 304s Mark Nottingham (Saturday, 10 February)

• Re: Updating Entity Headers with 304s Roy T. Fielding (Saturday, 10 February)
  • Re: Updating Entity Headers with 304s Mark Nottingham (Saturday, 10 February)
• Re: Updating Entity Headers with 304s Henrik Nordstrom (Saturday, 10 February)
  • Re: Updating Entity Headers with 304s Mark Nottingham (Saturday, 10 February)

http-link-header in GRDDL Danny Ayers (Thursday, 8 February)

• Re: http-link-header in GRDDL Harry Halpin (Sunday, 11 February)

Informal get-together in Prague Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 7 February)

[Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Julian Reschke (Friday, 2 February)

• Status 102, Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Julian Reschke (Saturday, 3 February)
  • Re: Status 102, Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Roy T. Fielding (Saturday, 3 February)
    • Re: Status 102, Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Henrik Nordstrom (Sunday, 4 February)
    • Re: Status 102, Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Asbjørn Ulsberg (Tuesday, 6 February)
      • Re: Status 102, Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Henrik Nordstrom (Tuesday, 6 February)
  • Re: Status 102, Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Jeffrey Mogul (Tuesday, 6 February)
    • HTTP status code registry, was: Status 102, Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Julian Reschke (Saturday, 17 February)
      • [NEW ISSUE] HTTP status code registry, was: Status 102 Henrik Nordstrom (Sunday, 18 February)
        • Re: [NEW ISSUE] HTTP status code registry, was: Status 102 Julian Reschke (Sunday, 18 February)
          • Re: [NEW ISSUE] HTTP status code registry, was: Status 102 Henrik Nordstrom (Sunday, 18 February)
            • Re: [NEW ISSUE] HTTP status code registry, was: Status 102 Julian Reschke (Sunday, 18 February)
• RE: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] S. Mike Dierken (Sunday, 4 February)
  • RE: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Henrik Nordstrom (Sunday, 4 February)
    • Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Adrien de Croy (Sunday, 4 February)
• RE: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Adrien de Croy (Monday, 12 February)
  • RE: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Henrik Nordstrom (Monday, 12 February)
    • Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Adrien de Croy (Monday, 12 February)
      • Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Henrik Nordstrom (Tuesday, 13 February)
        • Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Adrien de Croy (Tuesday, 13 February)
          • Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Henrik Nordstrom (Wednesday, 14 February)
    • Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Adrien de Croy (Monday, 12 February)
      • Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Jamie Lokier (Tuesday, 13 February)
      • Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Henrik Nordstrom (Tuesday, 13 February)
        • Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Adrien de Croy (Tuesday, 13 February)
          • Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Henrik Nordstrom (Wednesday, 14 February)
            • Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 14 February)
            • Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Jamie Lokier (Wednesday, 14 February)
            • Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Henrik Nordstrom (Wednesday, 14 February)
            • Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 14 February)
            • Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 15 February)
            • Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Adrien de Croy (Thursday, 15 February)
            • proposed mods to draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt Adrien de Croy (Tuesday, 20 March)
          • Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Jamie Lokier (Wednesday, 14 February)
            • Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 14 February)
            • Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Adrien de Croy (Wednesday, 14 February)
            • Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 15 February)
            • Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Jeffrey Mogul (Thursday, 15 February)
            • Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 15 February)
            • Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Henrik Nordstrom (Wednesday, 14 February)
    • Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Adrien de Croy (Tuesday, 13 February)
• Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt] Henrik Nordstrom (Tuesday, 13 February)

etag vs if-* vs range vs content-encoding? PA (Thursday, 1 February)

• Re: etag vs if-* vs range vs content-encoding? Henrik Nordstrom (Friday, 2 February)

Link Header draft Mark Nottingham (Sunday, 28 January)

• Re: Link Header draft Julian Reschke (Sunday, 28 January)
  • Re: Link Header draft Mark Nottingham (Sunday, 28 January)
    • Re: Link Header draft Roy T. Fielding (Monday, 29 January)
      • Re: Link Header draft Mark Nottingham (Saturday, 10 February)
        • Re: Link Header draft Mark Nottingham (Monday, 12 February)
          • Re: Link Header draft Anne van Kesteren (Monday, 12 February)
            • Re: Link Header draft Stefan Eissing (Monday, 12 February)
            • Re: Link Header draft Anne van Kesteren (Monday, 12 February)
            • Re: Link Header draft Julian Reschke (Monday, 12 February)
            • Re: Link Header draft Stefan Eissing (Monday, 12 February)
          • Re: Link Header draft Ian Hickson (Tuesday, 13 February)
            • Re: Link Header draft Mark Nottingham (Friday, 16 February)
            • Re: Link Header draft Ian Hickson (Friday, 16 February)
            • Re: Link Header draft Joe Gregorio (Friday, 16 February)
            • Re: Link Header draft Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 21 February)
            • RE: Link Header draft Mike Schinkel (Saturday, 24 February)
            • RE: Link Header draft Mike Schinkel (Saturday, 17 February)
            • Re: Link Header draft Anne van Kesteren (Saturday, 17 February)
        • Re: Link Header draft Julian Reschke (Friday, 16 February)
          • Re: Link Header draft Mark Nottingham (Friday, 16 February)
          • Re: Link Header draft Anne van Kesteren (Friday, 16 February)
            • Re: Link Header draft Julian Reschke (Friday, 16 February)

3.2.2 issue Mark Baker (Monday, 22 January)

• Re: 3.2.2 issue Henrik Nordstrom (Monday, 22 January)
  • Re: 3.2.2 issue Mark Baker (Monday, 22 January)
    • NEW ISSUE: http URLvs Request-URI, was: 3.2.2 issue Julian Reschke (Tuesday, 23 January)
      • Re: NEW ISSUE: http URLvs Request-URI, was: 3.2.2 issue Henrik Nordstrom (Wednesday, 24 January)
        • Re: NEW ISSUE: http URLvs Request-URI, was: 3.2.2 issue Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 24 January)
      • Re: NEW ISSUE: http URLvs Request-URI, was: 3.2.2 issue Roy T. Fielding (Wednesday, 24 January)
        • Re: NEW ISSUE: http URLvs Request-URI, was: 3.2.2 issue Henrik Nordstrom (Wednesday, 24 January)
          • Re: NEW ISSUE: http URLvs Request-URI, was: 3.2.2 issue Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 24 January)
            • Re: NEW ISSUE: http URLvs Request-URI, was: 3.2.2 issue Roy T. Fielding (Wednesday, 24 January)
            • Re: NEW ISSUE: http URLvs Request-URI, was: 3.2.2 issue Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 24 January)

Reminder: Comments on Domain Structure and cookie drafts requested Yngve Nysaeter Pettersen (Tuesday, 16 January)

i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests Mark Nottingham (Monday, 15 January)

• Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests William A. Rowe, Jr. (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests Mark Baker (Monday, 15 January)
• Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests Scott Lawrence (Monday, 15 January)
  • Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests Roy T. Fielding (Monday, 15 January)
    • Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests Mark Nottingham (Monday, 15 January)
      • Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests Henrik Nordstrom (Tuesday, 16 January)
      • Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests William A. Rowe, Jr. (Tuesday, 16 January)
      • Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests Scott Lawrence (Tuesday, 16 January)
        • Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests Henrik Nordstrom (Tuesday, 16 January)
        • Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests Mark Nottingham (Tuesday, 16 January)
          • Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests Roy T. Fielding (Tuesday, 16 January)
            • Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 17 January)
            • Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests Roy T. Fielding (Wednesday, 17 January)
            • Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests Mark Nottingham (Wednesday, 17 January)
            • Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests William A. Rowe, Jr. (Wednesday, 17 January)
          • Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests Henrik Nordstrom (Tuesday, 16 January)
            • Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests William A. Rowe, Jr. (Wednesday, 17 January)
            • Message delimiting security issues Henrik Nordstrom (Wednesday, 17 January)
            • Re: Message delimiting security issues Travis Snoozy (Wednesday, 17 January)
            • Re: Message delimiting security issues Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 17 January)
            • Re: Message delimiting security issues William A. Rowe, Jr. (Wednesday, 17 January)
            • Re: Message delimiting security issues Henrik Nordstrom (Wednesday, 17 January)
            • Re: Message delimiting security issues lists@ingostruck.de (Thursday, 18 January)
            • RE: Message delimiting security issues Larry Masinter (Friday, 19 January)
            • Re: Message delimiting security issues Roy T. Fielding (Friday, 19 January)
            • Re: Message delimiting security issues William A. Rowe, Jr. (Friday, 19 January)
            • Re: Message delimiting security issues Travis Snoozy (Wednesday, 17 January)
            • Re: Message delimiting security issues Henrik Nordstrom (Wednesday, 17 January)
            • Re: Message delimiting security issues Travis Snoozy (Wednesday, 17 January)
            • Re: Message delimiting security issues Henrik Nordstrom (Wednesday, 17 January)
            • Re: Message delimiting security issues Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 17 January)
            • Re: Message delimiting security issues William A. Rowe, Jr. (Wednesday, 17 January)
            • Re: Message delimiting security issues Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 18 January)
• Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests Henrik Nordstrom (Tuesday, 16 January)
  • Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests Henrik Nordstrom (Tuesday, 16 January)
  • Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests Jamie Lokier (Tuesday, 16 January)
    • Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests Henrik Nordstrom (Tuesday, 16 January)
    • Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests Yves Lafon (Wednesday, 17 January)
      • Re: i19 Bodies on GET (and other) requests Jamie Lokier (Thursday, 18 January)

New issue: 6.1.1 can on a quick reading be misread that it's a complete list of status codes Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 11 January)

New issue: 6.1.1 too vague about parsing requirements Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 11 January)

• Re: New issue: 6.1.1 too vague about parsing requirements Lisa Dusseault (Thursday, 11 January)
  • Re: New issue: 6.1.1 too vague about parsing requirements Henrik Nordstrom (Friday, 12 January)
    • Re: New issue: 6.1.1 too vague about parsing requirements Yves Lafon (Wednesday, 17 January)

HTTP idea Nicholas Shanks (Thursday, 11 January)

• RE: HTTP idea Joris Dobbelsteen (Thursday, 11 January)
• Re: HTTP idea Jamie Lokier (Thursday, 11 January)
  • RE: HTTP idea Larry Masinter (Thursday, 11 January)
    • Reducing HTTP payload size [was: RE: HTTP idea David Morris (Thursday, 11 January)
      • Re: Reducing HTTP payload size [was: RE: HTTP idea Nicholas Shanks (Thursday, 11 January)
        • Re: Reducing HTTP payload size [was: RE: HTTP idea Mike Dierken (Friday, 12 January)
          • RE: Reducing HTTP payload size [was: RE: HTTP idea Larry Masinter (Friday, 12 January)
        • Re: Reducing HTTP payload size [was: RE: HTTP idea David Morris (Friday, 12 January)
          • Re: Reducing HTTP payload size [was: RE: HTTP idea Henrik Nordstrom (Friday, 12 January)

Warning and Date Travis Snoozy (Volt) (Monday, 8 January)

NEW ISSUE: updating from RFC2048 to RFC4288 Julian Reschke (Friday, 5 January)

RE: Large content size value Travis Snoozy (Volt) (Thursday, 4 January)

• RE: Large content size value Paul Leach (Thursday, 4 January)
  • RE: Large content size value Travis Snoozy (Volt) (Thursday, 4 January)
    • RE: Large content size value Larry Masinter (Thursday, 4 January)
      • RE: Large content size value Travis Snoozy (Volt) (Thursday, 4 January)
        • RE: Large content size value David Morris (Friday, 5 January)
          • RE: Large content size value Travis Snoozy (Volt) (Friday, 5 January)
        • RE: Large content size value Henrik Nordstrom (Friday, 5 January)
          • RE: Large content size value Travis Snoozy (Volt) (Friday, 5 January)
          • RE: Large content size value Larry Masinter (Friday, 5 January)
            • RE: Large content size value Henrik Nordstrom (Friday, 5 January)
            • RE: Large content size value Travis Snoozy (Volt) (Friday, 5 January)
            • Re: Large content size value Jamie Lokier (Saturday, 6 January)
            • RE: Large content size value Travis Snoozy (Volt) (Monday, 8 January)
            • Re: Large content size value Jamie Lokier (Wednesday, 10 January)
• RE: Large content size value Joris Dobbelsteen (Thursday, 4 January)
• Re: Large content size value Roy T. Fielding (Thursday, 4 January)
• RE: Large content size value Scott Lawrence (Friday, 5 January)
  • Re: Large content size value William A. Rowe, Jr. (Friday, 5 January)
    • RE: Large content size value Travis Snoozy (Volt) (Friday, 5 January)
      • Re: Large content size value William A. Rowe, Jr. (Saturday, 6 January)

NEW ISSUE: Use of "Client" in 14.4 Travis Snoozy (Volt) (Thursday, 4 January)

• RE: NEW ISSUE: Use of "Client" in 14.4 Paul Leach (Thursday, 4 January)
  • Re: NEW ISSUE: Use of "Client" in 14.4 William A. Rowe, Jr. (Thursday, 4 January)
    • RE: NEW ISSUE: Use of "Client" in 14.4 Travis Snoozy (Volt) (Thursday, 4 January)
      • Re: NEW ISSUE: Use of "Client" in 14.4 William A. Rowe, Jr. (Friday, 5 January)
        • RE: NEW ISSUE: Use of "Client" in 14.4 Travis Snoozy (Volt) (Friday, 5 January)
    • RE: NEW ISSUE: Use of "Client" in 14.4 Paul Leach (Friday, 5 January)
  • RE: NEW ISSUE: Use of "Client" in 14.4 Travis Snoozy (Volt) (Thursday, 4 January)
    • Re: NEW ISSUE: Use of "Client" in 14.4 William A. Rowe, Jr. (Thursday, 4 January)
      • RE: NEW ISSUE: Use of "Client" in 14.4 Travis Snoozy (Volt) (Thursday, 4 January)
    • RE: NEW ISSUE: Use of "Client" in 14.4 Paul Leach (Friday, 5 January)
    • RE: NEW ISSUE: Use of "Client" in 14.4 Paul Leach (Friday, 5 January)
      • RE: NEW ISSUE: Use of "Client" in 14.4 Travis Snoozy (Volt) (Friday, 5 January)

Feedback on ISSUE 27 (PUT idempotency) Julian Reschke (Wednesday, 3 January)

• Re: Feedback on ISSUE 27 (PUT idempotency) Henrik Nordstrom (Wednesday, 3 January)
  • RE: Feedback on ISSUE 27 (PUT idempotency) Paul Leach (Wednesday, 3 January)
    • RE: Feedback on ISSUE 27 (PUT idempotency) Henrik Nordstrom (Thursday, 4 January)
      • Re: Feedback on ISSUE 27 (PUT idempotency) Mark Baker (Thursday, 4 January)

OT: Effective Spec Writing [was RE: Large content size value] Travis Snoozy (Volt) (Tuesday, 2 January)

Re: NEW ISSUE: Sort 1.3 Terminology Mark Nottingham (Monday, 1 January)

Re: NEW ISSUE: 13.1.2's Definition of 1xx Warn-Codes Mark Nottingham (Monday, 1 January)

• RE: NEW ISSUE: 13.1.2's Definition of 1xx Warn-Codes Travis Snoozy (Volt) (Tuesday, 2 January)
  • Re: NEW ISSUE: 13.1.2's Definition of 1xx Warn-Codes William A. Rowe, Jr. (Tuesday, 2 January)
    • RE: NEW ISSUE: 13.1.2's Definition of 1xx Warn-Codes Travis Snoozy (Volt) (Tuesday, 2 January)
      • RE: NEW ISSUE: 13.1.2's Definition of 1xx Warn-Codes Paul Leach (Tuesday, 2 January)
        • RE: NEW ISSUE: 13.1.2's Definition of 1xx Warn-Codes Travis Snoozy (Volt) (Tuesday, 2 January)
          • RE: NEW ISSUE: 13.1.2's Definition of 1xx Warn-Codes Paul Leach (Tuesday, 2 January)
  • RE: NEW ISSUE: 13.1.2's Definition of 1xx Warn-Codes Larry Masinter (Tuesday, 2 January)
    • RE: NEW ISSUE: 13.1.2's Definition of 1xx Warn-Codes Travis Snoozy (Volt) (Tuesday, 2 January)
      • Re: NEW ISSUE: 13.1.2's Definition of 1xx Warn-Codes Mike Whitehurst (Tuesday, 2 January)
        • Re: NEW ISSUE: 13.1.2's Definition of 1xx Warn-Codes Mark Nottingham (Thursday, 4 January)
      • RE: NEW ISSUE: 13.1.2's Definition of 1xx Warn-Codes Paul Leach (Tuesday, 2 January)
        • RE: NEW ISSUE: 13.1.2's Definition of 1xx Warn-Codes Travis Snoozy (Volt) (Tuesday, 2 January)

Re: NEW ISSUE: date formats in BNF and spec text, was: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos Mark Nottingham (Monday, 1 January)

Re: Allow is not in 13.5.2 Mark Nottingham (Monday, 1 January)

• RE: Allow is not in 13.5.2 Travis Snoozy (Volt) (Tuesday, 2 January)

Re: NEW ISSUE: editorial bug in 13.5.1 Mark Nottingham (Monday, 1 January)

Re: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos Mark Nottingham (Monday, 1 January)

• RE: RFC 2616 Errata: Misc. Typos Travis Snoozy (Volt) (Tuesday, 2 January)

Last message date: Saturday, 31 March 2007 16:51:37 UTC