- From: Stefan Eissing <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de>
- Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 13:56:31 +0100
- To: Nottingham Mark <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Am 12.02.2007 um 11:54 schrieb Anne van Kesteren: > > On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 09:58:35 +0100, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> > wrote: >> Oh - and there's also already an Atom link relations IANA >> registry, so it would require a certain amount of coordination. >> >> What do others think? Should there be a single, flat link relation >> registry? > > http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/RelExtensions It makes sense to keep a list at a known, stable location, which then references the defining documents/standards. Making a FCFS IANA as in http://www.iana.org/assignments/http- parameters would work, although it looks a bit twentycentury. Cheers, Stefan
Received on Monday, 12 February 2007 12:56:43 UTC