W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2007

RE: NEW ISSUE: 13.1.2's Definition of 1xx Warn-Codes

From: Travis Snoozy (Volt) <a-travis@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 11:01:51 -0800
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
CC: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <86EDC3963F04D546BED8996F77D290F6049D117DFA@NA-EXMSG-C138.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

Mark Nottingham said:
> Added as i54;
>    http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/issues/index.html#i54

The modified proposal (after discussion) is as follows (should fix all three problems mentioned):

"A cache MUST NOT generate 1xx warn-codes for any messages except cache
entries, and MUST NOT generate 1xx warn-codes for a cache entry except in
response to a validation attempt for that entry. 1xx warn-codes MUST NOT be
generated in Request messages."


-- Travis
Received on Tuesday, 2 January 2007 19:02:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:10:41 UTC