W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2007

RE: Large content size value

From: Joris Dobbelsteen <Joris@familiedobbelsteen.nl>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 23:54:27 +0100
Message-ID: <73427AD314CC364C8DF0FFF9C4D693FF54B9@nehemiah.joris2k.local>
To: "Travis Snoozy \(Volt\)" <a-travis@microsoft.com>, "Paul Leach" <paulle@windows.microsoft.com>, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
Cc: <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>

>-----Original Message-----
>From: ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org 
>[mailto:ietf-http-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Travis Snoozy (Volt)
>Sent: donderdag 4 januari 2007 23:01
>To: Paul Leach; Roy T. Fielding
>Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
>Subject: RE: Large content size value
>Deja vous; you forgot the client again (behavior is unspec'd).

So you have seriously compelling reasons to have this spec'd? I'm quite
My imagination leaves me behind at this moment.

But then again why not spec all potential problems that can occur?
Why not: it way beyond our capacity to handle...
Why not: the desired behaviours for such situation can be close to
infinite. You pointed one...

Ask 100 people and you will get several answers.
Pose the same question slightly different and you will end up with 100
different answers.

- Joris
Received on Thursday, 4 January 2007 22:53:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:10:41 UTC