W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2007

Re: [NEW ISSUE] HTTP status code registry, was: Status 102

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 11:37:57 +0100
Message-ID: <45D82C85.7000505@gmx.de>
To: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>

Henrik Nordstrom schrieb:
> sön 2007-02-18 klockan 10:24 +0100 skrev Julian Reschke:
> 
>> That's of course ok as well, but at this point we can't be sure that 
>> there will be a RFC2616bis anytime soon.
> 
> Well, to get there we can only do our best in updating the document and
> correct the issues seen and trying to get it accepted.
> 
> I very much prefer getting RFC2616bis out as a draft with the minimum
> needed updates compared to having complementary drafts published which
> doesn't even intend to become an RFC..

So it really should be on the issues list 
(<http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/issues/>) then. Mark, 
could you please add it?

Best regards, Julian
Received on Sunday, 18 February 2007 10:38:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:50:00 GMT