Re: Status 102, Re: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt]

  
    I haven't read the document in detail yet, but one thing that should be 
    considered is the choice of the new status code, 102. It collides with 
    the definition in RFC2518, a standards track RFC (see 
    <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc2518.html#rfc.section.10.1>).
    
Remember: there is an IANA "HTTP Status Code Registry", at
<http://www.iana.org/assignments/http-status-codes>, so people
should check this registry before choosing new status codes.

Not that draft-decroy-http-progress-00.txt necessarily justifies
one, of course.

-Jeff