W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2007

Feedback on ISSUE 27 (PUT idempotency)

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 11:08:43 +0100
Message-ID: <459B80AB.10905@gmx.de>
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org


(see <http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/1.1/rfc2616bis/issues/#i27>)

This topic was just discussed over on rest-discuss, and I think the 
recommendation is to relax/rephrase the definition of idempotency.

See: <http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/rest-discuss/message/7387>

Best regards, Julian

Received on Wednesday, 3 January 2007 10:08:53 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Henrik Nordstrom: "Re: Feedback on ISSUE 27 (PUT idempotency)"
Previous message: Travis Snoozy (Volt): "RE: NEW ISSUE: 13.1.2's Definition of 1xx Warn-Codes"
Next in thread: Henrik Nordstrom: "Re: Feedback on ISSUE 27 (PUT idempotency)"
Reply: Henrik Nordstrom: "Re: Feedback on ISSUE 27 (PUT idempotency)"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 6 June 2008 08:04:30 GMT