W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2007

Re: Link Header draft

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 17:10:10 +0100
Message-ID: <45D09162.8090208@gmx.de>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
CC: Stefan Eissing <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de>, Nottingham Mark <mnot@mnot.net>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>

Anne van Kesteren schrieb:
> On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 13:56:31 +0100, Stefan Eissing 
> <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 09:58:35 +0100, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> 
>>> wrote:
>>>> Oh - and there's also already an Atom link relations IANA registry, 
>>>> so it would require a certain amount of coordination.
>>>> What do others think? Should there be a single, flat link relation 
>>>> registry?
>>> http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/RelExtensions
>> It makes sense to keep a list at a known, stable location, which then 
>> references the defining documents/standards.
> Isn't that exactly what the link above does? (It's not entirely clear to 
> me, as you don't elaborate much on "known", "stable location" etc.)
> ...

I would be extremely surprised if the IESG would let us define a 
registry which is not maintained by IANA. We may get away with no 
registry at all, or a registry for short names, and allowing URIs in 
addition, though.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Monday, 12 February 2007 16:10:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:10:41 UTC