W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2007

Re: [NEW ISSUE] HTTP status code registry, was: Status 102

From: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 11:14:02 +0100
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1171793642.8226.3.camel@henriknordstrom.net>
sön 2007-02-18 klockan 10:24 +0100 skrev Julian Reschke:

> That's of course ok as well, but at this point we can't be sure that 
> there will be a RFC2616bis anytime soon.

Well, to get there we can only do our best in updating the document and
correct the issues seen and trying to get it accepted.

I very much prefer getting RFC2616bis out as a draft with the minimum
needed updates compared to having complementary drafts published which
doesn't even intend to become an RFC..


Received on Sunday, 18 February 2007 10:14:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:10:41 UTC