- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 09:51:56 +1100
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
...assuming we want a registry. Doing so would be a fairly large change from the model of HTML -- where the profile attribute allows extensibility, and that of Atom, where URIs provide extensibility. On 2007/02/17, at 5:49 AM, Ian Hickson wrote: > > On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Mark Nottingham wrote: >> >> I don't know that either of these is workable, given that HTML and >> Atom >> both use link relations. > > Atom has a document-level hyperlinking element with link types? I > thought > the linking in Atom was from individual feeds, not from the whole > document. > > If the linking in Atom is indeed from the whole document, such that it > makes sense to have it apply at the HTTP level, and if those > relationships > aren't compatible with HTML's, then we have a problem -- you can > easily > imagine a CDF situation with mixed Atom and HTML with Link: > headers, and I > can't see that either registry would "win" over the other. This would > imply that HTTP would need yet another third registry for > disambiguation. > > -- > Ian Hickson U+1047E ) > \._.,--....,'``. fL > http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _ > \ ;`._ ,. > Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'-- > (,_..'`-.;.' > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Wednesday, 21 February 2007 22:52:06 UTC