On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 08:42:40AM -0800, Travis Snoozy wrote: > On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 11:47:33AM +0100, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > <snip> > > Does the implied LWS rule apply to header names, even if it's not > > allowed in MIME? Allowing LWS around the header name does not make > > sense, but it is not explicitly forbidden. > > LWS is not allowed. > ... if you summarily dismiss the "implied LWS rule." Yes, LWS is allowed between tokens and separators. My mistake; I'm used to BNF explicitly specifying exactly what can and cannot happen, and not making implicit back-references. LWS SHOULD NOT be allowed. -- TravisReceived on Wednesday, 17 January 2007 17:02:39 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:50:00 GMT