W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2007

RE: NEW ISSUE: Use of "Client" in 14.4

From: Paul Leach <paulle@windows.microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 17:13:43 -0800
Message-ID: <76323E9F0A911944A4E9225FACFC55BA033088D4@WIN-MSG-20.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
To: "Travis Snoozy (Volt)" <a-travis@microsoft.com>, <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>

I'm not saying that changing it to "user-agent" isn't better. Or that
replacing MUST with SHOULD isn't a good idea. However, what's there
isn't hard to understand. Its intent is clear: if a client can't be
configured to express language preference, then it should not express
any. (That does _not_ mean that proxies should strip Accept-Language.)
We should focus on more important issues.

-----Original Message-----
From: Travis Snoozy (Volt) 
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 1:13 PM
To: Paul Leach; ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Subject: RE: NEW ISSUE: Use of "Client" in 14.4

Paul Leach said:
> I don't think its worth making that change.
> We need to be considerate of the people reading the updated spec and
> comparing it with the old one to see if they need to do anything. The
> diffs should be minimized, and since this one won't actually cause
> to do anything to their code, it might just as well be omitted.

... but that is then inconsiderate of anyone who is reading the spec
scratch, is it not? And since this *does* center around a MUST-level 
requirement, I for one think it's very important to fix. Even though the

likely intent is clear to anyone who thinks about it long enough, what
spec *says* will cause clients that do the sane thing to be

On the other hand, I don't think that anyone really cares if their 
client/server is "HTTP/1.1 conformant" at this point. I can't recall
ever claiming conformance, and literal conformance is probably
anyway (due to internal requirement conflicts). From this perspective,
got only an ad-hoc standard at best, and the MUSTs aren't really worth 
anything -- all that matters is "does my [client/server] work with 


-- Travis
Received on Friday, 5 January 2007 01:14:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:10:41 UTC