* Mark Nottingham wrote: >2xx so that browsers will display it. AFAICT, they do; or at least, >Safari and Firefox do (see <http://www.mnot.net/test/222.asis>). IE? >4xx might be more appropriate, but I despair of "friendly" error >messages. (thought they could be padded, I suppose). We have 402 and well-known workarounds for "friendly" error messages? >It would also be useful in those cases where you get redirected >somewhere to login and get a cookie for authentication; e.g., Yahoo!, >Google, Amazon, etc. Same situation, but slightly different use case. I don't multi-redirect login schemes merit further support. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/Received on Thursday, 15 March 2007 14:13:47 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 12 September 2008 03:48:55 GMT