W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2007

Re: Link Header draft

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 20:27:47 +0000 (UTC)
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0702132026430.2402@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>

On Mon, 12 Feb 2007, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> 
> Oh - and there's also already an Atom link relations IANA registry, so 
> it would require a certain amount of coordination.
> 
> What do others think? Should there be a single, flat link relation 
> registry?

The previous spec just deferred to HTML4 for its definitions, do we want 
to not do that here? It seems like it would be dangerous to invent a third 
namespace (especially one that overlaps with existing ones), especially 
for a feature used as rarely as this one.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 13 February 2007 20:27:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:50:00 GMT