W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2007

Re: Straw-man charter

From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 08:09:28 +0100
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org Group" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <fb4qu29es37vm3d743anouqkg1jcdmpgnq@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>

* Mark Nottingham wrote:
>   * Eliminate ambiguities where they affect interoperability

Specifications should not have ambiguities (that is, cases where the
specification can be read in multiple ways but no one knows for sure
which reading is correct); presumably you mean ambiguities should be
removed, e.g. by explicitly making certain things implementation-de-
fined or by introducing new requirements if required for interop.

>   * Identify mandatory-to-implement security mechanisms

This sounds rather controversial.

>The Working Group's sole specification deliverable is a document that  
>is suitable to supersede RFC2616.

I think the Working Group should be given the option to produce more
than one document to supercede RFC 2616; various suggestions what
could be factored out have been made here. The group might well decide
that keeping everything in one document is best, but it should not be
required to recharter if it decides otherwise.
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 
Received on Tuesday, 6 March 2007 07:09:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:50:00 GMT