Dealing with list problems Re: Fw: Image Galleries, Alt vs caption.
Dealing with list problems Re: Fw: Image Galleries, Alt vs caption.
[w3c-wai-ig] <none>
Screen-reader users needed for survey (IG)
UK Businesses Reject Accessible Web Sites
- RE: UK Businesses Reject Accessible Web Sites
- Re: UK Businesses Reject Accessible Web Sites
- Re: UK Businesses Reject Accessible Web Sites
- Re: UK Businesses Reject Accessible Web Sites
- Re: UK Businesses Reject Accessible Web Sites
- Who makes law Re: UK Businesses Reject Accessible Web Sites
- Re: Who makes law Re: UK Businesses Reject Accessible Web Sites
- Re: Who makes law Re: UK Businesses Reject Accessible Web Sites
- Re: Who makes law Re: UK Businesses Reject Accessible Web Sites
- Re: Who makes law Re: UK Businesses Reject Accessible Web Sites
- Re: Who makes law Re: UK Businesses Reject Accessible Web Sites
- Re: Who makes law Re: UK Businesses Reject Accessible Web Sites
- Re: Who makes law Re: UK Businesses Reject Accessible Web Sites
- Re: Who makes law Re: UK Businesses Reject Accessible Web Sites
- Re: Who makes law Re: UK Businesses Reject Accessible Web Sites
- Re: Who makes law Re: UK Businesses Reject Accessible Web Sites
- Re: Who makes law Re: UK Businesses Reject Accessible Web Sites
- Who makes law Re: UK Businesses Reject Accessible Web Sites
book review
Accessible data table
accessible survey generator?
Re: Handling Graphs and charts (Was RE: Alt (was Re: longdesc)
- Re: Handling Graphs and charts (Was RE: Alt (was Re: longdesc)
- Re: Handling Graphs and charts (Was RE: Alt (was Re: longdesc)
mixed results with screen readers and alt
Handling Graphs and charts (Was RE: Alt (was Re: longdesc)
- RE: Handling Graphs and charts (Was RE: Alt (was Re: longdesc)
- Re: Handling Graphs and charts (Was RE: Alt (was Re: longdesc)
- Re: Handling Graphs and charts (Was RE: Alt (was Re: longdesc)
RE: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for images)
RE: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for im ages)
- RE: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for im ages)
- Re: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for im ages)
- Re: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for im ages)
- Re: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for im ages)
Marc Faeh is out of the office.
RE: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for images)
- Re: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for images)
- RE: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for images)
- RE: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for images)
- RE: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for images)
- RE: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for images)
- RE: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for images)
- RE: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for images)
Re: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for images)
when to use longdesc for images (was RE: Short and long descriptions for links)
- Re: when to use longdesc for images (was RE: Short and long descriptions for links)
- Alt is not a decription (was Re: when to use longdesc for images)
- Re: Alt is not a decription (was Re: when to use longdesc for images)
- Re: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for images)
- Re: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for images)
- Re: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for images)
- Re: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for images)
- Re: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for images)
- Re: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for images)
- Re: Alt is not a decription (was Re: when to use longdesc for images)
- Re: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for images)
- Re: Alt is not a decription (was Re: when to use longdesc for images)
- Alt is not a decription (was Re: when to use longdesc for images)
Short and long descriptions for links
- Re: Short and long descriptions for links
- RE: Short and long descriptions for links
- RE: Short and long descriptions for links
- Re: Short and long descriptions for links
- RE: Short and long descriptions for links
- Re: Short and long descriptions for links
- Re: Short and long descriptions for links
- RE: Short and long descriptions for links
gifts for children with disabilities
W4A Call for Papers
Experience with NetEcho/ InternetSpeech
Links to laws
People from Western Australia?
moving text and Assistive Technology
Apologies for errant post
Text email newsletter standard
- RE: Text email newsletter standard
holiday gift offer
Call for Review: Last Call Working Draft of Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines 2.0
Ozewai report and see you next year
Winners of the Web Accessibility Contest 2004 in Germany
Image Galleries, Alt vs caption.
- Re: Image Galleries, Alt vs caption.
- Re: Image Galleries, Alt vs caption.
- Re: Image Galleries, Alt vs caption.
- RE: Image Galleries, Alt vs caption.
- RE: Image Galleries, Alt vs caption.
- RE: Image Galleries, Alt vs caption.
- RE: Image Galleries, Alt vs caption.
- RE: Image Galleries, Alt vs caption.
- Fw: Image Galleries, Alt vs caption.
- RE: Image Galleries, Alt vs caption.
Re: Testing Checkpoint 6.1 of WCAG 1.0: Style sheets
Fw: Information about the user frustration study
italian ATAG 2.0 analysis
Testing Checkpoint 6.1 of WCAG 1.0: Style sheets
- Re: Testing Checkpoint 6.1 of WCAG 1.0: Style sheets
- Re: Testing Checkpoint 6.1 of WCAG 1.0: Style sheets
- Re: Testing Checkpoint 6.1 of WCAG 1.0: Style sheets
- Re: Testing Checkpoint 6.1 of WCAG 1.0: Style sheets
Suggestions?
- Place hints in foreign language teaching material (was: Suggestions?)
- Re: Suggestions?
- RE: Suggestions?
[w3c-wai-ig] <none>
follow OzeWAI conference via IRC
Question about tables
- RE: Question about tables
- RE: Question about tables
- Re: Question about tables
- Re: Question about tables
- Re: Question about tables
button tag
Accessible E-Learning
XML format for captions?
Call for Review: Working Draft of Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0
Sidar's VIII Jornadas por IRC
Web Event: Access to Online Learning
FW: A Nation Online: Entering the Broadband Age
FYI: New Jaws Mailing List - Australian users group
Media: AccMonitor Compliance Server 2005 - EARL
Video "Web Sites That Work"
911 Report Available to PWD
November 22- 23, 2004: Unified Labor Law #12/2003
Media: includes info on new earl support
WCAG 2.0 - clarification
- RE: WCAG 2.0 - clarification
- RE: WCAG 2.0 - clarification
- RE: WCAG 2.0 - clarification
- RE: WCAG 2.0 - clarification
November 21 - 25, 2004: Materials management and handling
Join Teen Movie Zone - you'll see hardcore teens get f...!
authentification
December 5 - 9, 2004: Total Productive Maintenance (The Japanese Model for Business Excellence)
CaptionKeeper Recycles Captions for Web Streaming
Accessibility evaluation practices - online survey
Accessibility evaluation practices - online survey
VIII Jornadas SIDAR - 24-26 Nov, Bueos Aires, and about Puerto Rico
Join Teen Movie Zone - you'll see hardcore teens get f...!
Speech pronunciation of dates
RE Bobby
Fwd: Accessibility Re: SVG WG announces Last Call of SVG 1.2
Calendar markup - review please?
- Re: Calendar markup - review please?
- RE: Calendar markup - review please?
- RE: Calendar markup - review please?
- Re: Calendar markup - review please?
aDesigner - was Re: Bobby - a bad tool
- Re: aDesigner - was Re: Bobby - a bad tool
- Re: aDesigner - was Re: Bobby - a bad tool
- License conditions Re: aDesigner - was Re: Bobby - a bad tool
- Re: License conditions Re: aDesigner - was Re: Bobby - a bad tool
- RE: License conditions Re: aDesigner - was Re: Bobby - a bad tool
- RE: License conditions Re: aDesigner - was Re: Bobby - a bad tool
- RE: License conditions Re: aDesigner - was Re: Bobby - a bad tool
- RE: License conditions Re: aDesigner - was Re: Bobby - a bad tool
- Re: License conditions Re: aDesigner - was Re: Bobby - a bad tool
- RE: License conditions Re: aDesigner - was Re: Bobby - a bad tool
- RE: License conditions Re: aDesigner - was Re: Bobby - a bad tool
- RE: License conditions Re: aDesigner - was Re: Bobby - a bad tool
- Re: aDesigner - was Re: Bobby - a bad tool
Bobby - a bad tool
- RE: Bobby - a bad tool
- Re: Bobby - a bad tool
- Re: Bobby - a bad tool
- Re: Bobby - a bad tool
- Re: Bobby - a bad tool
- Re: Bobby - a bad tool
img alt=, next generation.
img alt=, next generation.
secure sites and other user agents:
accessibility at risk on commercial sites:
critique this:Fw: [nfbpnotk] NFB Launches New On-Line Publication
w3m
writing accessible content pages in course management systems
- Re: writing accessible content pages in course management systems
- Re: writing accessible content pages in course management systems
Best method for providing help for form fields
Fw: [SEC508] Web Site Testing
Fw: [VICUG-L] Fw: [AERNet] mainstream webmaster wishes to make site accessible/help
Ramdan seminars (www.settecltd.com) October newsletter
Fwd: 508 status
form submit buttons and javascript/hyperlinks
Link Text and Metadata
- Re: Link Text and Metadata
- Re: Link Text and Metadata
- RE: Link Text and Metadata
- Re: Link Text and Metadata
ATutor Community Development
Text only pages a good solution.
iCITA Petition (was Re: Accessible Web Publishing Wizard for Microsoft Office (UIUC))
e-government accessibility
mouse replacement software?
- Re: mouse replacement software?
- Re: mouse replacement software?
- RE: mouse replacement software?
- RE: mouse replacement software?
Sharm El-Sheikh: 10 - 18 December, 2004 - Achieving Business Excellence.
RE: Accessible Web Publishing Wizard for Microsoft Office (UIUC)
Fw: Calling non Windows users
SharePoint Portal Server Users -- Beta Testers
Re: Accessible Web Publishing Wizard for Microsoft Office (UIUC)
Accessible Web Publishing Wizard for Microsoft Office (UIUC)
- RE: Accessible Web Publishing Wizard for Microsoft Office (UIUC)
- RE: Accessible Web Publishing Wizard for Microsoft Office (UIUC)
- RE: Accessible Web Publishing Wizard for Microsoft Office (UIUC)
- RE: Accessible Web Publishing Wizard for Microsoft Office (UIUC)
- RE: Accessible Web Publishing Wizard for Microsoft Office (UIUC)
- RE: Accessible Web Publishing Wizard for Microsoft Office (UIUC)