- From: Matthew J. Giustino <mjg@giustiweb.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 07:01:35 -0500
- To: Patrick Lauke <P.H.Lauke@salford.ac.uk>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
- Message-ID: <41C8109F.5090104@giustiweb.com>
I totally agree with Patrick. I would also like to add that you also have the "alt" attribute (alt; Defines a _short _description of the image) available to you. Matthew J. Giustino Patrick Lauke wrote: >From: John Colby [mailto:John.Colby@uce.ac.uk] > > >>I'm trying to rationalise which type of images (with the >>exception of graphs and visual data presentation) that need >>a longdesc without sighted readers also needing that description >>available. Graphs and data images (my term), being the visual >>interpretation of some data - do they need to be described or >>does the data need to be stated? I can think of instances where >>either one or both would be suitable. >> >> > >This probably depends heavily on the context, the purpose of the >site, and the purpose of the images themselves. Two examples: > >- a web hosting site, with your generic "businessman with laptop" or >"handshake" images, probably do not need longdesc...it's not the fact >that it's the businessman with the laptop that's important here, it's >just generic visual fluff (although yes, some could argue that there is >a certain "emotional response" or similar triggered by the image, and >one could try to convey that in non-visual ways somehow...but usually >I'd suggest adding that in the normal copy as well - if, for instance, >you're using the image to portray the company as "dynamic and mobile", >this should feature in the body of the text as well...making it >unnecessary to add this non-visual information any additional way) > >- an online art photography site, where you have a gallery of famous >photos; here, the images themselves will probably need to be >"longdescribed": they're not just decoration, they *are* content, and it >is important that visitors "get" this content > >Hope this made some kind of sense. Of course, there will be borderline >cases and blatant exceptions...it's mostly a judgement call that you need >to make, based on what purpose your images serve within the overall >purpose of your site. > >Patrick >________________________________ >Patrick H. Lauke >Webmaster / University of Salford >http://www.salford.ac.uk > >
Received on Tuesday, 21 December 2004 12:01:58 UTC