w3c-wai-ig@w3.org from October to December 2004 by date

Friday, 31 December 2004

• Re: Dealing with list problems Re: Fw: Image Galleries, Alt vs caption. David Woolley
• RE: Image Galleries, Alt vs caption. Francois Jordaan
• Dealing with list problems Re: Fw: Image Galleries, Alt vs caption. Charles McCathieNevile
• Dealing with list problems Re: Fw: Image Galleries, Alt vs caption. Charles McCathieNevile
• Dealing with list problems Re: Fw: Image Galleries, Alt vs caption. Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Fw: Image Galleries, Alt vs caption. Charles McCathieNevile
• [w3c-wai-ig] <none> Dave S.
• Fw: Image Galleries, Alt vs caption. John Britsios
• Oops RE: Image Galleries, Alt vs caption. Charles McCathieNevile

Thursday, 30 December 2004

• RE: Image Galleries, Alt vs caption. B.K. DeLong
• RE: Image Galleries, Alt vs caption. B.K. DeLong
• RE: Image Galleries, Alt vs caption. Francois Jordaan
• RE: Image Galleries, Alt vs caption. Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Image Galleries, Alt vs caption. B.K. DeLong
• Re: Image Galleries, Alt vs caption. John Britsios
• RE: Image Galleries, Alt vs caption. B.K. DeLong

Tuesday, 28 December 2004

• Re: Who makes law Re: UK Businesses Reject Accessible Web Sites david poehlman
• Re: Who makes law Re: UK Businesses Reject Accessible Web Sites Access Systems
• Re: Who makes law Re: UK Businesses Reject Accessible Web Sites Access Systems
• Re: Who makes law Re: UK Businesses Reject Accessible Web Sites david poehlman
• Re: Who makes law Re: UK Businesses Reject Accessible Web Sites Access Systems
• Re: Who makes law Re: UK Businesses Reject Accessible Web Sites david poehlman
• Re: Who makes law Re: UK Businesses Reject Accessible Web Sites Access Systems
• Re: Who makes law Re: UK Businesses Reject Accessible Web Sites David Woolley
• Screen-reader users needed for survey (IG) Joe Clark
• Real cost of accessibility (re ethics and money) Charles McCathieNevile

Sunday, 26 December 2004

• Who makes law Re: UK Businesses Reject Accessible Web Sites Charles McCathieNevile

Saturday, 25 December 2004

• Re: UK Businesses Reject Accessible Web Sites Isofarro
• Re: UK Businesses Reject Accessible Web Sites Isofarro
• Re: Ethics and money Re: UK Businesses Reject Accessible Web Sites Access Systems
• Ethics and money Re: UK Businesses Reject Accessible Web Sites Charles McCathieNevile

Friday, 24 December 2004

• Re: UK Businesses Reject Accessible Web Sites David Woolley
• Re: UK Businesses Reject Accessible Web Sites Andy Heath
• RE: UK Businesses Reject Accessible Web Sites Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: UK Businesses Reject Accessible Web Sites Ineke van der Maat

Thursday, 23 December 2004

• Re: UK Businesses Reject Accessible Web Sites Access Systems
• RE: UK Businesses Reject Accessible Web Sites John Colby
• UK Businesses Reject Accessible Web Sites David Woolley
• Re: Accessible data table Access Systems
• book review JMMAW@aol.com
• Re: Accessible data table Sebastiano.Nutarelli@csi.it
• Re: Accessible data table david poehlman
• Re: Accessible data table B.K. DeLong
• Re: Accessible data table B.K. DeLong
• Re: Accessible data table david poehlman
• Re: Accessible data table Access Systems
• Accessible data table B.K. DeLong

Wednesday, 22 December 2004

• Re: accessible survey generator? Charles McCathieNevile

Tuesday, 21 December 2004

• RE: Image Galleries, Alt vs caption. B.K. DeLong
• Re: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for im ages) David Woolley
• Re: Short and long descriptions for links David Woolley
• Re: Handling Graphs and charts (Was RE: Alt (was Re: longdesc) David Woolley
• Re: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for images) David Woolley
• Re: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for images) David Woolley
• Re: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for images) David Woolley
• accessible survey generator? david poehlman
• Re: Handling Graphs and charts (Was RE: Alt (was Re: longdesc) david poehlman
• Re: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for images) david poehlman
• Re: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for images) Léonie Watson
• Re: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for images) david poehlman
• RE: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for images) Patrick Lauke
• Re: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for images) david poehlman
• RE: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for images) Patrick Lauke
• Re: Handling Graphs and charts (Was RE: Alt (was Re: longdesc) Sailesh Panchang
• Re: mixed results with screen readers and alt david poehlman
• Indicating that something is a link (was Re: Alt is not a description) David Dorward
• Re: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for images) david poehlman
• Re: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for images) david poehlman
• Re: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for im ages) david poehlman
• Re: Handling Graphs and charts (Was RE: Alt (was Re: longdesc) Jon Gunderson
• RE: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for images) Patrick Lauke
• Re: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for images) David Dorward
• Re: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for images) david poehlman
• Re: Handling Graphs and charts (Was RE: Alt (was Re: longdesc) david poehlman
• RE: Handling Graphs and charts (Was RE: Alt (was Re: longdesc) Patrick Lauke
• Re: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for im ages) david poehlman
• mixed results with screen readers and alt Jennifer Sutton
• Re: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for im ages) Andy J. W. Affleck
• RE: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for im ages) John M Slatin
• Handling Graphs and charts (Was RE: Alt (was Re: longdesc) John Colby
• RE: Short and long descriptions for links John M Slatin
• RE: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for images) Patrick Lauke
• RE: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for images) John M Slatin
• RE: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for im ages) Katie Smith
• Re: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for images) david poehlman
• RE: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for images) Patrick Lauke
• Re: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for images) david poehlman
• Re: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for images) Andy J. W. Affleck
• RE: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for images) John Colby
• Re: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for images) david poehlman
• Re: Short and long descriptions for links david poehlman
• Re: Short and long descriptions for links david poehlman
• Re: Short and long descriptions for links david poehlman
• Re: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for images) Matthew J. Giustino
• Re: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for images) Léonie Watson
• Re: Short and long descriptions for links david poehlman
• Marc Faeh is out of the office. Marc Faeh
• Re: Alt is not a decription (was Re: when to use longdesc for images) david poehlman
• RE: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for images) John Colby
• Re: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for images) david poehlman
• Re: Short and long descriptions for links david poehlman
• Re: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for images) Léonie Watson
• Re: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for images) david poehlman
• Re: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for images) david poehlman
• Re: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for images) David Dorward
• Re: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for images) Tina Holmboe
• Re: Short and long descriptions for links Matthew J. Giustino
• Re: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for images) Matthew J. Giustino
• Re: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for images) David Dorward
• Re: Alt is not a decription (was Re: when to use longdesc for images) Matthew J. Giustino
• Alt is not a decription (was Re: when to use longdesc for images) David Dorward
• Re: when to use longdesc for images (was RE: Short and long descriptions for links) Matthew J. Giustino
• RE: Short and long descriptions for links Derek Featherstone
• when to use longdesc for images (was RE: Short and long descriptions for links) Patrick Lauke
• RE: Short and long descriptions for links John Colby
• Re: Short and long descriptions for links David Dorward
• RE: Short and long descriptions for links Patrick Lauke
• Re: Short and long descriptions for links David Dorward
• Re: Short and long descriptions for links Matthew J. Giustino
• RE: Short and long descriptions for links Patrick Lauke
• Re: Short and long descriptions for links Matthew J. Giustino
• Short and long descriptions for links Tipton, William

Monday, 20 December 2004

• Re: W4A Call for Papers Charles McCathieNevile

Friday, 17 December 2004

• Re: W4A Call for Papers Yeliz Yesilada
• Re: Links to laws Martin Stehle
• gifts for children with disabilities JMMAW@aol.com
• Re: W4A Call for Papers David Woolley

Thursday, 16 December 2004

• W4A Call for Papers Yeliz Yesilada
• Experience with NetEcho/ InternetSpeech Mitake Burts

Wednesday, 15 December 2004

• RE: Links to laws Chuck Hitchcock

Tuesday, 14 December 2004

• Re: Links to laws Redazione AriadneCMS
• RE: Links to laws Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo
• Links to laws Paul Bohman

Monday, 13 December 2004

• RE: Text email newsletter standard Pawson, David

Saturday, 11 December 2004

• People from Western Australia? Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: moving text and Assistive Technology Charles McCathieNevile

Thursday, 9 December 2004

• Re: Text email newsletter standard Mike Brown
• Re: Text email newsletter standard Laura Carlson
• Re: Text email newsletter standard david poehlman
• Re: Text email newsletter standard david poehlman
• Re: moving text and Assistive Technology david poehlman
• RE: moving text and Assistive Technology John M Slatin
• Re: moving text and Assistive Technology Léonie Watson
• RE: Text email newsletter standard Bart Simons
• Re: Text email newsletter standard David Woolley
• Re: Text email newsletter standard David Woolley
• Re: Text email newsletter standard David Woolley
• Re: Text email newsletter standard Gian Sampson-Wild \(PurpleTop\)
• moving text and Assistive Technology Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Text email newsletter standard Matthew Smith
• Re: Text email newsletter standard david poehlman
• Re: Text email newsletter standard Mike Brown

Wednesday, 8 December 2004

• Apologies for errant post John M Slatin
• Re: Text email newsletter standard david poehlman
• Re: Text email newsletter standard Matthew Smith
• RE: Text email newsletter standard Jamal Mazrui
• Re: Text email newsletter standard david poehlman
• Re: Text email newsletter standard Matthew Smith
• Re: Text email newsletter standard Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Text email newsletter standard Matthew Smith
• Re: Text email newsletter standard Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: Text email newsletter standard Terrence Wood
• Re: Text email newsletter standard david poehlman
• RE: Text email newsletter standard Phill Jenkins
• RE: Text email newsletter standard Patrick Lauke
• Re: Text email newsletter standard david poehlman
• RE: Text email newsletter standard Patrick Lauke
• Re: Text email newsletter standard Phill Jenkins
• RE: Text email newsletter standard Patrick Lauke
• Text email newsletter standard Mike Brown

Tuesday, 7 December 2004

• holiday gift offer JMMAW@aol.com
• Call for Review: Last Call Working Draft of Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 Judy Brewer
• Ozewai report and see you next year Charles McCathieNevile

Monday, 6 December 2004

• RE: Image Galleries, Alt vs caption. John M Slatin
• Re: Winners of the Web Accessibility Contest 2004 in Germany Martin Stehle
• Re: Winners of the Web Accessibility Contest 2004 in Germany Tomas Caspers
• Winners of the Web Accessibility Contest 2004 in Germany Martin Stehle
• RE: Image Galleries, Alt vs caption. B.K. DeLong
• Re: italian ATAG 2.0 analysis Charles McCathieNevile

Sunday, 5 December 2004

• Re: Image Galleries, Alt vs caption. david poehlman
• Re: Image Galleries, Alt vs caption. david poehlman
• Re: Image Galleries, Alt vs caption. Matthew Smith
• Re: Image Galleries, Alt vs caption. Patrick H. Lauke
• Image Galleries, Alt vs caption. B.K. DeLong

Saturday, 4 December 2004

• Re: Testing Checkpoint 6.1 of WCAG 1.0: Style sheets Annmarie L Gemma

Friday, 3 December 2004

• Re: Testing Checkpoint 6.1 of WCAG 1.0: Style sheets Alastair Campbell
• Re: Testing Checkpoint 6.1 of WCAG 1.0: Style sheets Jon Gunderson
• Fw: Information about the user frustration study david poehlman
• Re: Suggestions? Jens Meiert
• Re: Testing Checkpoint 6.1 of WCAG 1.0: Style sheets Redazione AriadneCMS

Thursday, 2 December 2004

• Re: Suggestions? David Woolley

Friday, 3 December 2004

• Re: Testing Checkpoint 6.1 of WCAG 1.0: Style sheets Terrence Wood
• Re: Testing Checkpoint 6.1 of WCAG 1.0: Style sheets Bryce Fields
• Re: Testing Checkpoint 6.1 of WCAG 1.0: Style sheets iris

Thursday, 2 December 2004

• italian ATAG 2.0 analysis Next Design | Luca Mascaro ::.
• Re: Testing Checkpoint 6.1 of WCAG 1.0: Style sheets Tina Holmboe
• Testing Checkpoint 6.1 of WCAG 1.0: Style sheets Annmarie L Gemma
• RE: Suggestions? Pawson, David
• Re: Suggestions? Jens Meiert
• Place hints in foreign language teaching material (was: Suggestions?) David Woolley
• OzeWAI on IRC - still Friday (Melbourne time) Charles McCathieNevile

Wednesday, 1 December 2004

• Suggestions? mike stevens
• [w3c-wai-ig] <none> Charles McCathieNevile

Tuesday, 30 November 2004

• follow OzeWAI conference via IRC Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Question about tables David Woolley
• Re: button tag David Woolley
• Re: Question about tables Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Question about tables John Britsios
• RE: Question about tables Jamal Mazrui
• RE: Question about tables Patrick Lauke
• Question about tables Becker, Klaus (LNG-MUE)
• Re: button tag Luis Fernando Llana Díaz

Monday, 29 November 2004

• Re: button tag Matthew Smith
• Re: button tag David Woolley
• Re: button tag David Dorward
• RE: button tag Patrick Lauke
• RE: button tag Patrick Lauke
• button tag Luis Fernando Llana Díaz
• Accessible E-Learning Jeremy Hurst

Sunday, 28 November 2004

• Re: XML format for captions? Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: XML format for captions? Matt May
• Re: XML format for captions? Patrick H. Lauke
• XML format for captions? Patrick H. Lauke

Thursday, 25 November 2004

• Call for Review: Working Draft of Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 Judy Brewer

Wednesday, 24 November 2004

• Sidar's VIII Jornadas por IRC Charles McCathieNevile
• Web Event: Access to Online Learning Madeleine Rothberg

Tuesday, 23 November 2004

• FW: A Nation Online: Entering the Broadband Age John M Slatin

Friday, 19 November 2004

• FYI: New Jaws Mailing List - Australian users group Charles McCathieNevile

Wednesday, 17 November 2004

• Media: AccMonitor Compliance Server 2005 - EARL Robert Yonaitis
• Video "Web Sites That Work" Carlos A Velasco

Monday, 15 November 2004

• 911 Report Available to PWD JMMAW@aol.com

Saturday, 13 November 2004

• RE: WCAG 2.0 - clarification Harry Loots

Thursday, 11 November 2004

• Re: Speech pronunciation of dates David Woolley
• Re: Speech pronunciation of dates David Woolley

Monday, 8 November 2004

• November 22- 23, 2004: Unified Labor Law #12/2003 Settec Seminars

Wednesday, 10 November 2004

• RE: WCAG 2.0 - clarification Joe Clark

Tuesday, 9 November 2004

• Media: includes info on new earl support Robert B. Yonaitis
• RE: WCAG 2.0 - clarification Ben Caldwell
• Re: WCAG 2.0 - clarification Martin Stehle
• RE: WCAG 2.0 - clarification Lois Wakeman
• RE: WCAG 2.0 - clarification Joe Clark

Monday, 8 November 2004

• RE: WCAG 2.0 - clarification John M Slatin
• WCAG 2.0 - clarification zara

Thursday, 4 November 2004

• November 21 - 25, 2004: Materials management and handling Settec Seminars

Sunday, 7 November 2004

• Join Teen Movie Zone - you'll see hardcore teens get f...! 18 whore

Saturday, 6 November 2004

• authentification zara

Monday, 1 November 2004

• December 5 - 9, 2004: Total Productive Maintenance (The Japanese Model for Business Excellence) Settec Seminars

Tuesday, 2 November 2004

• CaptionKeeper Recycles Captions for Web Streaming geoff freed

Monday, 1 November 2004

• Re: Calendar markup - review please? Access Systems
• Re: Calendar markup - review please? Harry Loots

Sunday, 31 October 2004

• Accessibility evaluation practices - online survey Dey Alexander
• Re: Accessibility evaluation practices - online survey Patrick H. Lauke
• Accessibility evaluation practices - online survey Dey Alexander

Saturday, 30 October 2004

• RE: img alt=, next generation. Charles McCathieNevile
• VIII Jornadas SIDAR - 24-26 Nov, Bueos Aires, and about Puerto Rico Charles McCathieNevile

Friday, 29 October 2004

• Join Teen Movie Zone - you'll see hardcore teens get f...! Watch Me Fuck Online!
• Re: License conditions Re: aDesigner - was Re: Bobby - a bad tool David Woolley
• Re: Calendar markup - review please? Access Systems
• Re: Calendar markup - review please? Marjolein Katsma
• Re: Calendar markup - review please? Harry Loots
• Re: accessibility at risk on commercial sites: Harry Loots
• RE: License conditions Re: aDesigner - was Re: Bobby - a bad tool Harry Loots
• Re: Calendar markup - review please? Marjolein Katsma
• RE: License conditions Re: aDesigner - was Re: Bobby - a bad tool Patrick Lauke
• RE: License conditions Re: aDesigner - was Re: Bobby - a bad tool Pawson, David
• Re: License conditions Re: aDesigner - was Re: Bobby - a bad tool Charles McCathieNevile

Thursday, 28 October 2004

• RE: License conditions Re: aDesigner - was Re: Bobby - a bad tool Jim Tobias
• Re: Calendar markup - review please? ADAM GUASCH
• Re: aDesigner - was Re: Bobby - a bad tool Phill Jenkins
• Re: License conditions Re: aDesigner - was Re: Bobby - a bad tool Access Systems
• Re: License conditions Re: aDesigner - was Re: Bobby - a bad tool Phill Jenkins
• Re: Calendar markup - review please? Access Systems
• Re: Calendar markup - review please? Marjolein Katsma
• RE: License conditions Re: aDesigner - was Re: Bobby - a bad tool Access Systems
• RE: License conditions Re: aDesigner - was Re: Bobby - a bad tool Access Systems
• Speech pronunciation of dates incerti auctoris
• Re: Calendar markup - review please? Martin Stehle
• RE: License conditions Re: aDesigner - was Re: Bobby - a bad tool Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: License conditions Re: aDesigner - was Re: Bobby - a bad tool Patrick Lauke
• Re: License conditions Re: aDesigner - was Re: Bobby - a bad tool John Britsios
• Re: Calendar markup - review please? Sailesh Panchang
• RE: License conditions Re: aDesigner - was Re: Bobby - a bad tool Kevin O'Sullivan
• RE: License conditions Re: aDesigner - was Re: Bobby - a bad tool Patrick Lauke
• RE: License conditions Re: aDesigner - was Re: Bobby - a bad tool Jim Tobias
• RE: Accessibility Re: SVG WG announces Last Call of SVG 1.2 Emmanuelle Gutierrez y Restrepo
• RE: License conditions Re: aDesigner - was Re: Bobby - a bad tool Patrick Lauke
• RE: Calendar markup - review please? Access Systems
• Re: License conditions Re: aDesigner - was Re: Bobby - a bad tool Access Systems
• Re: Calendar markup - review please? Access Systems
• Re: Calendar markup - review please? Access Systems
• Re: Bobby - a bad tool Laura Carlson
• RE: Calendar markup - review please? Marjolein Katsma
• RE: Calendar markup - review please? John M Slatin
• License conditions Re: aDesigner - was Re: Bobby - a bad tool Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Calendar markup - review please? Marjolein Katsma
• Re: Calendar markup - review please? Martin Stehle
• RE Bobby Alice Good
• Fwd: Accessibility Re: SVG WG announces Last Call of SVG 1.2 Jonathan Chetwynd
• Calendar markup - review please? Marjolein Katsma
• Re: Bobby - a bad tool Jens Meiert

Wednesday, 27 October 2004

• Re: aDesigner - was Re: Bobby - a bad tool Patrick H. Lauke
• Re: aDesigner - was Re: Bobby - a bad tool Matthew Smith
• aDesigner - was Re: Bobby - a bad tool Phill Jenkins
• Re: Bobby - a bad tool Elizabeth J. Pyatt
• Re: Bobby - a bad tool ATutor
• Re: Bobby - a bad tool Brent Morris
• Re: Bobby - a bad tool Sailesh Panchang
• Re: Bobby - a bad tool John Britsios
• RE: Bobby - a bad tool John Foliot - WATS.ca
• Bobby - a bad tool Alice Good

Tuesday, 26 October 2004

• RE: img alt=, next generation. Pawson, David
• RE: img alt=, next generation. Pawson, David
• Re: img alt=, next generation. Charles McCathieNevile

Monday, 25 October 2004

• img alt=, next generation. Erika Noll Webb
• RE: img alt=, next generation. Patrick Lauke
• img alt=, next generation. Pawson, David

Sunday, 24 October 2004

• Re: secure sites and other user agents: david poehlman
• Re: secure sites and other user agents: Charles McCathieNevile

Saturday, 23 October 2004

• Re: secure sites and other user agents: David Woolley

Sunday, 24 October 2004

• Re: Browser stats Re: accessibility at risk on commercial sites: David Woolley
• Browser stats Re: accessibility at risk on commercial sites: Charles McCathieNevile

Saturday, 23 October 2004

• secure sites and other user agents: david poehlman
• Re: accessibility at risk on commercial sites: David Woolley
• Re: accessibility at risk on commercial sites: Matthew Smith

Thursday, 21 October 2004

• Re: accessibility at risk on commercial sites: david poehlman
• Re: accessibility at risk on commercial sites: David Woolley
• accessibility at risk on commercial sites: david poehlman
• critique this:Fw: [nfbpnotk] NFB Launches New On-Line Publication david poehlman

Wednesday, 20 October 2004

• Re: w3m Patrick H. Lauke
• w3m Alice Good
• Re: writing accessible content pages in course management systems David Woolley
• Re: writing accessible content pages in course management systems Charles McCathieNevile
• writing accessible content pages in course management systems Janet Perkins Corbett

Monday, 18 October 2004

• Best method for providing help for form fields Matthew Smith
• Fw: [SEC508] Web Site Testing david poehlman

Sunday, 17 October 2004

• Fw: [VICUG-L] Fw: [AERNet] mainstream webmaster wishes to make site accessible/help david poehlman
• mt research project. edson rufino de souza

Thursday, 14 October 2004

• Ramdan seminars (www.settecltd.com) October newsletter Settec Training

Friday, 15 October 2004

• Fwd: 508 status JMMAW@aol.com

Thursday, 14 October 2004

• Re: form submit buttons and javascript/hyperlinks Matthew Smith
• Re: form submit buttons and javascript/hyperlinks David Woolley
• Re: Link Text and Metadata Sailesh Panchang
• Re: Link Text and Metadata Sailesh Panchang
• Re: Link Text and Metadata david poehlman
• RE: Link Text and Metadata John M Slatin
• Re: Link Text and Metadata david poehlman
• Re: Link Text and Metadata david poehlman
• Re: Link Text and Metadata david poehlman
• form submit buttons and javascript/hyperlinks ANtony Tennant
• Re: Link Text and Metadata Patrick H. Lauke
• Link Text and Metadata Matthew Smith

Wednesday, 13 October 2004

• ATutor Community Development info@atutor.ca
• Re: mouse replacement software? Charles McCathieNevile
• It don't work Re: Text only pages a good solution. Charles McCathieNevile

Tuesday, 12 October 2004

• Text only pages a good solution. Harry Woodrow
• RE: mouse replacement software? Patrick Lauke
• Re: mouse replacement software? Phill Jenkins
• RE: mouse replacement software? John Foliot - WATS.ca
• Re: mouse replacement software? Patrick H. Lauke
• RE: mouse replacement software? Phill Jenkins

Monday, 11 October 2004

• iCITA Petition (was Re: Accessible Web Publishing Wizard for Microsoft Office (UIUC)) Sesock, Kevin A
• RE: mouse replacement software? Derek Featherstone
• Re: e-government accessibility zara
• e-government accessibility zara

Saturday, 9 October 2004

• Re: mouse replacement software? Helder Ferreira
• Re: mouse replacement software? Helder Ferreira
• mouse replacement software? Patrick H. Lauke

Monday, 4 October 2004

• Sharm El-Sheikh: 10 - 18 December, 2004 - Achieving Business Excellence. Settec Training

Thursday, 7 October 2004

• RE: Accessible Web Publishing Wizard for Microsoft Office (UIUC) Marjolein Katsma
• RE: Accessible Web Publishing Wizard for Microsoft Office (UIUC) Pawson, David

Wednesday, 6 October 2004

• RE: Accessible Web Publishing Wizard for Microsoft Office (UIUC) Sesock, Kevin A
• RE: Accessible Web Publishing Wizard for Microsoft Office (UIUC) Patrick Lauke
• RE: Accessible Web Publishing Wizard for Microsoft Office (UIUC) Bailey, Bruce
• RE: Accessible Web Publishing Wizard for Microsoft Office (UIUC) Sesock, Kevin A
• RE: Accessible Web Publishing Wizard for Microsoft Office (UIUC) Sesock, Kevin A
• Re: Accessible Web Publishing Wizard for Microsoft Office (UIUC) Brian Kelly
• Fw: Calling non Windows users david poehlman
• Re: Fw: [SEC508] Web Accessibility in the Courts TANAKA Satoko

Tuesday, 5 October 2004

• SharePoint Portal Server Users -- Beta Testers Robert Yonaitis
• Re: Accessible Web Publishing Wizard for Microsoft Office (UIUC) Jon Gunderson
• Accessible Web Publishing Wizard for Microsoft Office (UIUC) Sesock, Kevin A
• Fw: [SEC508] Web Accessibility in the Courts david poehlman

Monday, 4 October 2004

• Re: mozilla firefox problem? Marjolein Katsma
• sitemorse John M. Morse
• Re: mozilla firefox problem? Jens Meiert
• mozilla firefox problem? abhay

Friday, 1 October 2004

• Re: Proper description for links Laura Carlson
• media: Separate text-only version? No thanks! david poehlman
• Re: Proper description for links David Woolley
• Re: Proper description for links Terrence Wood
• Proper description for links Tipton, William

Last message date: Friday, 31 December 2004 12:15:14 UTC