- From: Laura Carlson <lcarlson@d.umn.edu>
- Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 10:56:43 -0600
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
--On Thursday, December 9, 2004 david poehlman wrote: > This discussion could only be enriched if the > developers of the standard were present. I've written to Dan Jellinek Editor of E-Access Bulletin at headstar.com asking for his insight. As for me, I learned about TEN through the E-Access Bulletin. And for over two and a half years now, like Gian, I've been using the TEN type of format as a navigation aid in my own Web Design Update Newsletter: http://www.d.umn.edu/goto/webdevlist All my user feedback has been positive. Here are some comments from my subscribers regarding what they like about the TEN format: "Attention to accessible-friendliness." "Clearly distinguished separate sections and articles." "Summary of contents at the top of each issue." "Attention to accessibility issues." "Spacing between the heading and articles." "Consistency and clear writing." "Organization and format." "The simplicity." "Easy navigation through each issue." To date I haven't received any negative feedback. All the Best, Laura ___________________________________________ Laura L. Carlson Information Technology Systems and Services University of Minnesota Duluth Duluth, MN, U.S.A. 55812-3009 http://www.d.umn.edu/goto/webdesign/
Received on Thursday, 9 December 2004 17:00:04 UTC