- From: Jennifer Sutton <jensutton@earthlink.net>
- Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 10:30:34 -0500
- To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Hello: >I will quote both David and Patrick, for clarity. My comments begin with JS. > > From: david poehlman >[...] > > In reality, for some reason, you can also still get the image > > name when > > either alt="" or alt=" " are used. > >JS: To follow on from David's previous message (in the alt descriptions >discussion), where he suggested, as an example alt="***", I don't think >that'd be an ideal solution. Asterisks might speak, I should think, >depending upon a user's settings with a screen reader. >Patrick wrote: Isn't that a shortcoming of the user agent and/or assistive >technology? Should it be the page author's responsibility to find >(dis)ingenious solutions to this? >JS: Yes, Patrick, I couldn't agree with you more. I am more and more >concerned that User Agents (specifically screen readers in my case) seem >to be providing confusing results. It is causing confusion to developers >who are less experienced, but are still thinking they should test with >screen readers. >Patrick: Out of interest, which browser/AT does this happen in? JS: Yes, has anyone made a study of this, and if so, could specifics be shared, perhaps under a different subject heading? I happen to be struggling with this issue right now. I have a serious philosophical problem with designing to one User Agent i.e. screen reader.
Received on Tuesday, 21 December 2004 15:35:13 UTC