- From: Access Systems <accessys@smart.net>
- Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 21:07:11 -0500 (EST)
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@sidar.org>
- cc: Andy Heath <a.k.heath@shu.ac.uk>, John Colby <john.colby@uce.ac.uk>, David Woolley <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>, w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
On Fri, 24 Dec 2004, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > <quote who="Andy Heath"> > > It seems to me that peace is always cheaper than war! > > Unless of course you are a general or an arms > > maker. > ... > Yes. This is an important point - some people are. > > What happened to ethical reasons for doing stuff ? > > What happened to being decent to people and > > not trying to screw them ? > ... > > Having a world where everyone can join in is > > something worth having. Arguing about cost > > is deception ;-). > > Actually my interest in Accessibility has quite a lot ot do with the fact > that it is frustrating to me to have a communications technology that > doesn't communicate. > > A fully costed analysis of accessibility (cost to implement, savings made, > new revenue generated) is an extremely rare beast, and I have never seen > one that is public. The closest we get are some statements about some > costs or benefits of some project or other. in my real life I am a transportation engineer. some years ago I did a cost/benefit analysis of mainline accessible transit vs paratransit service. I proved in court that the mainline transit was very cost effective. the only error I made in the long run was many of my projections were too conservative. New York City saves over $30,000.00 a day by using lift buses vs paratransit vans, these are real numbers and they are valid, and so is the 12million a year that they have they wouldn't have. > So long as this is the case, those who argue (based on no real strong > evidence) that accessibility costs a great deal can keep doing so in the > face of general statements that it doesn't cost much, which are not > themselves supported by the sort of evidence that scientists (even social > scientists) would be keen to accept - let alone the kind of evidence that > accountants tend to demand. so someone who really knows the issue should put it together. I only use the web accessiblity don't know too much about the costing of it. Bob ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ CONFIGURE YOUR E-MAIL TO SEND TEXT ONLY, see http://expita.com/nomime.html +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve Neither liberty nor safety", Benjamin Franklin - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ASCII Ribbon Campaign accessBob NO HTML/PDF/RTF in e-mail accessys@smartnospam.net NO MSWord docs in e-mail Access Systems, engineers NO attachments in e-mail, *LINUX powered* access is a civil right *#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*# THIS message and any attachments are CONFIDENTIAL and may be privileged. They are intended ONLY for the individual or entity named
Received on Saturday, 25 December 2004 02:07:16 UTC