- From: david poehlman <david.poehlman@handsontechnologeyes.com>
- Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 08:10:23 -0500
- To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>, "B.K. DeLong" <bkdelong@pobox.com>
caption and alt serve two different purposes, caption is more like title. alt is replacement. Johnnie Apple Seed ----- Original Message ----- From: "B.K. DeLong" <bkdelong@pobox.com> To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> Sent: Saturday, December 04, 2004 9:25 PM Subject: Image Galleries, Alt vs caption. Hi all - I thought I'd drop this by you all to see what you think. Perhaps I'm just tired and overthinking the matter. I'm producing an image gallery standard that I want to make accessible as possible. In the past, we've used 4 column tables - 1 row for images and a second row for captions. In theory, I could associate the caption cell with the image cell it goes to but inherently, it's not a proper table data. So I'm looking for a different option. Probably tables or an inline unordered list. I was thinking - is it overly redundant to have both an ALT attribute on an image and a caption under the image? Most users will see the one caption. But wouldn't a screenreader potentially read both? Is there a valid way to associate a caption with an image? Is the table solution more logical in this casE? Thanks in advance. -- B.K. DeLong bkdelong@pobox.com +1.617.797.2472 http://bkdelong.mit.edu Work. http://www.brain-stream.com Play. http://www.the-leaky-cauldron.org Potter. http://www.city-of-doors.com Sigil. http://www.hackerfoundation.org Future. http://www.osvdb.org/ Security. http://www.wkdelong.org Son. PGP Fingerprint: 38D4 D4D4 5819 8667 DFD5 A62D AF61 15FF 297D 67FE FOAF: http://foaf.brain-stream.org
Received on Sunday, 5 December 2004 13:10:53 UTC