- From: david poehlman <david.poehlman@handsontechnologeyes.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 19:47:14 -0500
- To: "Mike Brown" <mike@signify.co.nz>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Mike, The markings in the news letter standard are also important to note. They aid in skimming through the news letter much as header skimming aids in a well formatted html document or paragraph skimming or page skimming for that matter in other media. It may be psudo structure, but it feels like structure to me and whether or not to call it a standard is something I won't argue, but It is a practice that has been developped through a lot of work and I have seen its evolution in various forms for a number of yeras now. It would be nice to see something like this adopted uniformly across the email news letter discenination milu but then there are some news letters which may not lend themselves to this format. I have seen a bunch of formats though and have to figure out what is being attempted by each one if there is one so having a uniform approach would make that process simpler. Johnnie Apple Seed ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Brown" <mike@signify.co.nz> To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 7:30 PM Subject: Re: Text email newsletter standard Thank you for all the feedback on this. The picture I'm getting is something like this: - Plain text email is an unstructured medium - Newsletters are an example of a document where structure is important - At least some people (Matthew notwithstanding :) want to receive newsletters via email - Whilst the structure of the newsletter can be shown with HTML, it is always a good thing to provide a plain text version So, is the attempt by the text email newsletter standard to provide what Patrick called "pseudo-structural information" something that is useful or beneficial? Personally I'm not so conecerned about them calling it a "standard" when it clearly isn't. If it helps promote something which is a good thing, then that can surely be forgiven! Aside from the "pseudo-structural" sutff in the standard, a lot of it seemed to me to be good practice, but not necessarily something writing a newsletter would think about. For example, spelling out things rather than using symbols, putting the name number and date of the newsletter first, having a contents section at the top etc Thanks again. Mike
Received on Thursday, 9 December 2004 00:47:49 UTC