RE: License conditions Re: aDesigner - was Re: Bobby - a bad tool

On Thu, 28 Oct 2004, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:

> Although I work mostly on free software I don't object to people making a
> living out of good software (heaven knows, even in our field there are
> some people doing it, and others making a living out of rubbish). And I
> don't suppose that Phill, or one of the alphaworks developers, chose the
> license. But it would be nice if they could pass on the feedback that the
> license doesn't seem to match the real world.

that is my big gripe, I don't mind buying software, but I want to actually
BUY the software not rent it, and basically that is all that you are
getting a license to use it, but not to own your own copy,  that's why I
go to the bookstore, if I wanted to borrow a book I would go to the
library.

in the early days of even M$ you bought thier software, you could use it
yourself. sell it to a friend, loan it out. (not copy it) because it was
"yours"

Bob


++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
CONFIGURE YOUR E-MAIL TO SEND TEXT ONLY, see http://expita.com/nomime.html
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve Neither liberty nor safety",    Benjamin Franklin
-   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -
   ASCII Ribbon Campaign                        accessBob
    NO HTML/PDF/RTF in e-mail                   accessys@smartnospam.net
    NO MSWord docs in e-mail                    Access Systems, engineers
    NO attachments in e-mail,  *LINUX powered*   access is a civil right
*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#*#
THIS message and any attachments are CONFIDENTIAL and may be
privileged.  They are intended ONLY for the individual or entity named

Received on Thursday, 28 October 2004 16:51:36 UTC