- From: John Colby <John.Colby@uce.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2004 23:07:35 -0000
- To: "David Woolley" <david@djwhome.demon.co.uk>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 23 December 2004 23:08:07 UTC
Biggest problem is that as yet ther's no case law in the UK - the two cases brought in July 2003 were settled out of court
John
-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-ig-request@w3.org on behalf of David Woolley
Sent: Thu 23/12/2004 22:45
To: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
Cc:
Subject: UK Businesses Reject Accessible Web Sites
There was an article in The Register today:
<http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/12/23/plcs_hit_back_at_complaints_on_accessibility/>
that is about a committee of major UK companies who have basically said:
1) they believe that providing phone access excuses them from making
web sites accessible;
2) the cost of fixing all their myriads of inaccessible pages would be
excessive;
3) if the law wants to force them to make web sites accessible, it must be
explicit guidelines.
The article wasn't clear as to where on the line between:
- comply with WCAG level X; and
- mechanically verifiable rules,
was meant by explicit guidelines.
Received on Thursday, 23 December 2004 23:08:07 UTC