- From: Matthew Smith <matt@kbc.net.au>
- Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 08:30:36 +1030
- To: david poehlman <david.poehlman@handsontechnologeyes.com>
- CC: w3c-wai-ig@w3.org
david poehlman wrote: > except that for many of us, email is much better suited for content > rendering than the web. David - do you mean that plain text is rendered better by software (such as screen readers)? This statement confirms, however Patrick's statement that there should be a choice. Although maybe that should be choices. There are, of course, two issues at stake here: 1) the delivery medium: 1a) Picked up by client (Web) 1b) Delivered to client (email) 2) the document format: 2a) Plain text 2b) (X)HTML 2c) PDF 2d) etcetera... So, we should really be offering of what we want to receive and how we want to receive it. -- Matthew Smith South Australia http://www.kbc.net.au FOAF: http://www.mss.cx/foaf.rdf
Received on Wednesday, 8 December 2004 22:02:00 UTC