- From: david poehlman <david.poehlman@handsontechnologeyes.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 11:54:24 -0500
- To: "Patrick Lauke" <P.H.Lauke@salford.ac.uk>, <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
Patrick and all, I would like to suggest that non alt be abandoned, but I set html graphics to all in jaws simply because there are some situations in which I have found myself that I would not find stuff were it not rendered and labeled/tagged graphics are not sufficiently rendering of that information. I believe that jaws 5.0 or 5.1 fixed the asterisks issue. I'll have to do some testing. I'll have to investigate the letter thing, but basically, if you use alt="" or alt=" ", they are ignored. I would think that in a valid world, jaws should ignore null alt no matter what you set the verbosity of html images to be. Johnnie Apple Seed ----- Original Message ----- From: "Patrick Lauke" <P.H.Lauke@salford.ac.uk> To: <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 11:39 AM Subject: RE: Alt is not a description (was Re: when to use longdesc for images) > From: david poehlman > I'm talking about setting jaws html graphics to all not > visual graphics. I > have images suppressed in ie. Ok, got the wrong end of the stick there before. So, basically you've set JAWS to announce all graphics, not just the tagged ones? I did a test with JAWS 4.02 set to announce all graphics in HTML, and tried it on an image with an alt="***" as you suggested before...but interestingly, JAWS ignores the alt just the same way that it does alt="" or alt=" " in that particular mode, and just announces the filename. Only once I actually put some "normal" letter from the alphabet in the alt would it announce alt rather than the filename. In any case, it sounds like this is very dependent on user settings, and I'd posit that users are at least partially responsible for setting up their system in the way that works best for them. You consciously changed the HTML options in Jaws (although I can't seem to replicate the effect that you describe), which overrides any type of graceful hiding of purely visual fluff images (which, unless I misunderstand you, is the effect that you wanted to achieve in the first place). This does not, however, mean that using a null alt is a practice that should be abandoned (if that was what you were suggesting). Patrick ________________________________ Patrick H. Lauke Webmaster / University of Salford http://www.salford.ac.uk
Received on Tuesday, 21 December 2004 16:54:57 UTC