- From: david poehlman <david.poehlman@handsontechnologeyes.com>
- Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 07:59:28 -0500
- To: "Matthew Smith" <matt@kbc.net.au>, <bkdelong@pobox.com>
- Cc: "WAI Interest Group" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org>
I'm not certain, but if the images are links, alt will probably be the only value expressed by a screen reader through tabbing. Without links, either way, we have to crawl the page. Johnnie Apple Seed ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matthew Smith" <matt@kbc.net.au> To: <bkdelong@pobox.com> Cc: "WAI Interest Group" <w3c-wai-ig@w3.org> Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2004 12:17 AM Subject: Re: Image Galleries, Alt vs caption. B.K. DeLong wrote: <blockquote> > I was thinking - is it overly redundant to have both an ALT attribute on > an image and a caption under the image? Most users will see the one > caption. But wouldn't a screenreader potentially read both? Is there a > valid way to associate a caption with an image? Is the table solution > more logical in this casE? </blockquote> I wrote a Perl/MySQL based image gallery system 18 months or so ago. You can see some of the HTML it puts out here: <http://new.coppervale.cx/stuff/gallery> I know the code's a bit broken, but this may give you an idea. Cheers M -- Matthew Smith Kadina Business Consultancy South Australia http://www.kbc.net.au
Received on Sunday, 5 December 2004 13:00:02 UTC