Monday, 30 June 1997
- Re: ERB decision: colon as name character
- (trivial correction) Re: IDs - make them case sensitive
- Re: IDs - make them case sensitive
- Re: (off topic) MCF and XML-data and declarations in instances
- Re: (off topic) MCF and XML-data and declarations in instances
- Re: Normative Reference to SGML?
- Re: (off topic) MCF and XML-data and declarations in instances
- Re: New work-queue item: Conditional inclusion
- Re: Translation of the XML FAQ 1.0
- Re: Normative Reference to SGML?
- Re: Normative Reference to SGML?
- Re: Update on namespaces
- Re: ERB decision: colon as name character
- Re: ERB decision: colon as name character
Sunday, 29 June 1997
- Re: ERB decision: colon as name character
- Re: ERB decision: colon as name character
- ERB decision: colon as name character
- Re: Normative Reference to SGML?
- Re: Normative Reference to SGML?
- Re: (off topic) MCF and XML-data and declarations in instances
- Re: On the abolishment of IDs (Re: IDs - make them case sensitive)
- Re: On the abolishment of IDs (Re: IDs - make them case sensitive)
Saturday, 28 June 1997
- Re: IDs - make them case sensitive
- Normative Reference to SGML?
- (off topic) MCF and XML-data and declarations in instances
- Re: On the abolishment of IDs (Re: IDs - make them case sensitive)
- Re: IDs - make them case sensitive
- Re: On the abolishment of IDs (Re: IDs - make them case sensitive)
- Re: IDs - make them case sensitive
- Re: IDs - make them case sensitive
- Re: IDs - make them case sensitive
- Re: IDs - make them case sensitive
- Re: IDs - make them case sensitive
- On the abolishment of IDs (Re: IDs - make them case sensitive)
- change of address
- Re: IDs - make them case sensitive
- Re: IDs - make them case sensitive
- RE: IDs - make them case sensitive
- RE: IDs - make them case sensitive
- Re: IDs - make them case sensitive
Friday, 27 June 1997
- Re: IDs - make them case sensitive
- Re: IDs - make them case sensitive
- Re: IDs - make them case sensitive
- Re: IDs - make them case sensitive
- Re: IDs - make them case sensitive
- Re: IDs - make them case sensitive
- Re: Update on namespaces
- Re: IDs - make them case sensitive
- Re: Update on namespaces
- Re: Update on namespaces
- Re: IDs - make them case sensitive
- Re: IDs - make them case sensitive
- Re: IDs - make them case sensitive
- Re: IDs - make them case sensitive
- Re: IDs - make them case sensitive
- Re: IDs - make them case sensitive
- Re: IDs - make them case sensitive
- Re: IDs - make them case sensitive
- Re: IDs - make them case sensitive
- Re: IDs - make them case sensitive
- Re: Revised SGML Declaration for XML 1.0
- Re: Revised SGML Declaration for XML 1.0
- Re: IDs - make them case sensitive
- Re: IDs - make them case sensitive
- Re: Update on namespaces
- Re: IDs - make them case sensitive
- Re: Swedish news article
- Re: IDs - make them case sensitive
- Re: Swedish news article
- Swedish news article
- Re: Revised SGML Declaration for XML 1.0
- Re: IDs - make them case sensitive
- Re: Revised SGML Declaration for XML 1.0
- Re: Revised SGML Declaration for XML 1.0
- IDs - make them case sensitive
- Revised SGML Declaration for XML 1.0
- Re: Update on namespaces
- Re: Update on namespaces
- RE: Update on namespaces
- RE: Update on namespaces
Thursday, 26 June 1997
Wednesday, 25 June 1997
- Re: Update on namespaces
- Re: Meaning of normative references [was: Update on namespaces]
- Re: Meaning of normative references [was: Update on namespaces]
- Re: Meaning of normative references [was: Update on namespaces]
- Re: Meaning of normative references [was: Update on namespaces]
- Re: Meaning of normative references [was: Update on namespaces]
- Re: Meaning of normative references [was: Update on namespaces]
Tuesday, 24 June 1997
- Re: Update on namespaces
- Version numbers: "XML 1.0" [was: Update on namespaces]
- Meaning of normative references [was: Update on namespaces]
- Re: Parameter entities vs. GI name groups
- Re: Parameter entities vs. GI name groups
Monday, 23 June 1997
- Re: MCF (1st round)
- re: Determination of Encoding
- Glyph Folks discussion list
- Re: Parameter entities vs. GI name groups
- Re: XML-LINK: EXTENDED and EMBED
- Re: Parameter entities vs. GI name groups
- re: Determination of Encoding
- Re: Parameter entities vs. GI name groups
- Re: Parameter entities vs. GI name groups
- Re: Parameter entities vs. GI name groups
- Re: Documentation for DTDs (was HDML DTD)
- re: Determination of Encoding
- Re: KISS again
- XML-data and SGML
- Re: Parameter entities vs. GI name groups
- WebSGML DTD for MCF (corrected #1)
- WebSGML DTD for MCF
- Change of approach on the namespace problem
- XML-Data
- Re: Documentation for DTDs (was HDML DTD)
- Re: XML-LINK: EXTENDED and EMBED
- Update: SGML WG to XML IG transition
- ERB decision: Character sets
- ERB decision: External entities
- Re: Sdecl in XML and SGML+TC N1929
Sunday, 22 June 1997
- Sdecl in XML and SGML+TC N1929
- Re: Documentation for DTDs (was HDML DTD)
- Re: Documentation for DTDs (was HDML DTD)
- Re: Documentation for DTDs (was HDML DTD)
- MCF again
- XML-LINK: EXTENDED and EMBED
- Documentation for DTDs (was HDML DTD)
- Fwd: HDML DTD
Saturday, 21 June 1997
- XML PI = FSI ? (was In defense of PEs ...)
- Re: In defense of PEs (but not in XML) (was Re: Parameter entities vs. GI name groups)
- Re: In defense of PEs (but not in XML) (was Re: Parameter entities vs. GI name groups)
- Re: AW: Parameter entities vs. GI name groups
- Re: Parameter entities vs. GI name groups
- Re: In defense of PEs (but not in XML) (was Re: Parameter entities vs. GI name groups)
- Re: KISS again
- Re: Parameter entities vs. GI name groups
- Re: Namespaces, the universe, and everything
- In defense of PEs (but not in XML) (was Re: Parameter entities vs. GI name groups)
- Re: Parameter entities vs. GI name gro
- Re: Parameter entities vs. GI name groups
- Re: Parameter entities vs. GI name groups
- Re: Parameter entities vs. GI name groups
- Re: Parameter entities vs. GI name gro
- Re: Parameter entities vs. GI name groups
- Re: Validating Namespaces - How To
- Re: KISS again
Friday, 20 June 1997
- Re: KISS again
- Re: Parameter entities vs. GI name groups
- KISS again
- Re: Validating Namespaces - How To
- Re: Parameter entities vs. GI name groups
- Re: PE's
- Re: a vote in favour of ditching PE's
- Re: Parameter entities vs. GI name groups
- Validating Namespaces - How To
- Re: Parameter entities vs. GI name groups
- Re: Parameter entities vs. GI name groups
- re: Determination of Encoding
- Re: AW: Update on namespacesw3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
- Re: Parameter entities vs. GI name groups
- Re: Update on namespaces
- Re: Parameter entities vs. GI name groups
- Re: Parameter entities vs. GI name groups
- Re: AW: Update on namespaces
- Re: Parameter entities vs. GI name groups
- Re: Parameter entities vs. GI name groups
- Re: AW: Update on namespaces
- Re: Parameter entities vs. GI name groups
- Re: Namespaces, the universe, and everything
- Re: Update on namespaces
- Re: Parameter entities vs. GI name groups
- WG list behavior
- Re: a vote in favour of ditching PE's
- Re: AW: Update on namespaces
- Re: Parameter entities vs. GI name groups
- Re: Parameter entities vs. GI name groups
- Re: Parameter entities vs. GI name groups
- Re: a vote in favour of ditching PE's
- Re: namespace viz validation [was RE: DSIGS]
- Re: Parameter entities vs. GI name groups
- Re: Parameter entities vs. GI name groups
- Re: Parameter entities vs. GI name groups
- Re: Update on namespaces
- Re: Parameter entities vs. GI name groups
- a vote in favour of ditching PE's
- Re: AW: Update on namespaces
- Re: Parameter entities vs. GI name groups
- Re: Namespaces, the universe, and everything
- Re: thoughts on namespaces
- Re: Parameter entities vs. GI name gro
- Re: Parameter entities vs. GI name groups
- Re: Parameter entities vs. GI name gro
- AW: Update on namespaces
- Re: Namespaces, the universe, and everything
- Re: Namespaces, the universe, and everything
- Re: re http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/9705/namespace.htm
- WG8 slowness (was Re: Update on namespaces)
- Draconian: Re: Determination of Encoding
- Re: Parameter entities vs. GI name groups
- Re: Namespaces, the universe, and everything
- SGML WG archives are working
- Re: Namespaces, the universe, and everything
- Re: Parameter entities vs. GI name groups
- Re: Update on namespaces
- Re: Parameter entities vs. GI name groups
- Re: Parameter entities vs. GI name groups
- re: Determination of Encoding
- Re: Parameter entities vs. GI name groups
- Re: Parameter entities vs. GI name gro
- Re: re http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/9705/namespace.htm
- re http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/9705/namespace.htm
- Re: Parameter entities vs. GI name groups
Thursday, 19 June 1997
- Re: Namespaces, the universe, and everything
- Re: Parameter entities vs. GI name gro
- Re: Parameter entities vs. GI name gro
- Re: Parameter entities vs. GI name groups
- Re: Parameter entities vs. GI name groups
- Re: Namespaces, the universe, and everything
- Re: Namespaces, the universe, and everything
- re: Determination of Encoding
- Re: Update on namespaces
- Re: Namespaces, the universe, and everything
- Re: Namespaces, the universe, and everything
- Re: Namespaces, the universe, and everything
- Re: Namespaces, the universe, and everything
- Re: Parameter entities vs. GI name groups
- Re: Namespaces, the universe, and everything
- Re: Update on namespaces
- Re: Update on namespaces
- Namespaces, the universe, and everything
- Just for the record
- Re: namespace viz validation
- Re: Update on namespaces
- Re: Update on namespaces
- thoughts on namespaces
- Re: namespace viz validation [was RE: DSIGS]
Friday, 20 June 1997
Thursday, 19 June 1997
- Re: Parameter entities vs. GI name groups
- XML Link and External Entities
- XML extended links
- Re: namespace viz validation [was RE: DSIGS]
- Re: Parameter entities vs. GI name groups
- Parameter entities vs. GI name groups
- Re: namespace viz validation [was RE: DSIGS]
- Re: namespace viz validation [was RE: DSIGS]
- Re: namespace viz validation [was RE: DSIGS]
- re: Determination of Encoding
- Re: Update on namespaces
- Re: ERB meeting of June 18
- Re: Update on namespaces
- Re: Update on namespaces
- Re: Update on namespaces
- Re: namespace viz validation
Wednesday, 18 June 1997
- Re: Subelement addressing
- Re: Update on namespaces
- Re: Subelement addressing
- Re: Update on namespaces
- Re: Update on namespaces
- Re: Update on namespaces
- Re: namespace viz validation [was RE: DSIGS]
- Re: Update on namespaces
- Re: Update on namespaces
- Re: Update on namespaces
- Re: Update on namespaces
- namespace viz validation [was RE: DSIGS]
- Re: Update on namespaces
- Re: Update on namespaces
- RE: DSIGS
- Re: Update on namespaces
- ERB meeting of June 18
- Re: Update on namespaces
- Re: Update on namespaces
Thursday, 19 June 1997
Wednesday, 18 June 1997
- xml-lang & namespace: should "." be dumper from names?
- Re: Update on namespaces
- RE: Update on namespaces
- Re: Subelement addressing
- Re: Subelement addressing
- Re: Subelement addressing
- About "namespaces"
Tuesday, 17 June 1997
- Re: Update on namespaces
- Re: Update on namespaces
- Subelement addressing
- Re: Associating stylesheets with documents
- Re: When and how should tesuji be a link?
- Interesting product offering
- Public Apology
- re: Determination of Encoding
- xml-link PIs
Monday, 16 June 1997
- RE: fragment exchange (was Re: rationales for TEI extended-pointe r keywords)
- Re: fragment exchange (was Re: rationales for TEIextended-pointer keywords)
- Re: fragment exchange (was Re: rationales for TEIextended-pointer keywords)
- re: Determination of Encoding
- Re: When and how should tesuji be a link?
- Re: When and how should tesuji be a link?
- Re: Determination of Encoding (Re: Invasion of the pseudo-people ...)
- Re: Determination of Encoding (Re: Invasion of the pseudo-people ...)
- Re: I18N issue needs consideration
- Re: When and how should tesuji be a link?
- Re: I18N issue needs consideration
- Since I'm being grumpy
- Re: Update on namespaces
- Re: requiring DTDs [was: RE Deleta est]
Sunday, 15 June 1997
- Re: Associating stylesheets with documents
- Re: Update on namespaces
- Re: I18N issue needs consideration
- Re: When and how should tesuji be a link?
- Re: Associating stylesheets with documents
- Re: Associating stylesheets with documents
- RE: fragment exchange (was Re: rationales for TEI extended-pointe r keywords)
- Associating stylesheets with documents
- Re: I18N issue needs consideration
- Re: I18N issue needs consideration
- Re: I18N issue needs consideration
Saturday, 14 June 1997
- When and how should tesuji be a link?
- Re: USES Notations (was part of Update on namespaces)
- Re: !BEHAVIOR
- Re: fragment exchange (was Re: rationales for TEI extended-pointe r keywords)
- Re: Determination of Encoding (Re: Invasion of the pseudo-people ...)
- Re: Determination of Encoding (Re: Invasion of the pseudo-people ...)
- Determination of Encoding (Re: Invasion of the pseudo-people ...)
- Re: fragment exchange (was Re: rationales for TEI extended-pointer keywords)
- Fw: fragment exchange (Resend corrected)
- Re: fragment exchange (was Re: rationales for TEIextended-pointer keywords)
- RE: !BEHAVIOR
- RE: fragment exchange (was Re: rationales for TEI extended-pointe r keywords)
- RE: !BEHAVIOR
- Re: fragment exchange (was Re: rationales for TEIextended-pointer keywords)
- Re: I18N issue needs consideration
- Re: I18N issue needs consideration
Friday, 13 June 1997
- Re: I18N issue needs consideration
- Re: fragment exchange (was Re: rationales for TEI extended-pointer keywords)
- Re: I18N issue needs consideration
- Re: fragment exchange (was Re: rationales for TEI extended-pointer keywords)
- RE: !BEHAVIOR
- Re: I18N issue needs consideration
- Re: fragment exchange (was Re: rationales for TEI extended-pointer keywords)
- Re: fragment exchange (was Re: rationales for TEI extended-pointer keywords)
- Re: USES Notations (was part of Update on namespaces)
- Once more into the breach (I18N)
- A possible fallback for namespaces
- DTD parsing (a proposal)
- RE: The importance of PUBLIC (response to NOTATIONS and DATA TYPE S)
- Re: requiring DTDs [was: RE Deleta est]
- Re: RE deleta est
- Re: USES Notations (was part of Update on namespaces)
- fragment exchange (was Re: rationales for TEI extended-pointer keywords)
- Re: requiring DTDs [was: RE Deleta est]
- requiring DTDs [was: RE Deleta est]
Thursday, 12 June 1997
- Re: RE deleta est
- Re: rationales for TEI extended-pointer keywords
- Re: rationales for TEI extended-pointer keywords
- Re: Update on namespaces
- Re: Update on namespaces
- Re: Netscape metadata submission to W3C uses XML
- Return of the undead debate! (was Re: The importance of PUBLIC)
- RE: !BEHAVIOR
- Re: !BEHAVIOR
- Re: The importance of PUBLIC (response to NOTATIONS and DATA TYPES)
- Re: I18N issue needs consideration
- Re: I18N issue needs consideration
- Re: Comments on Part 1: Asian characters
- Re: I18N issue needs consideration
- Re: USES Notations (was part of Update on namespaces)
- RE: !BEHAVIOR
- The importance of PUBLIC (response to NOTATIONS and DATA TYPES)
- RE: !BEHAVIOR
- Re: Netscape metadata submission to W3C uses XML
- Re: I18N issue needs consideration
- Re: USES Notations (was part of Update on namespaces)
- a simple convention for hygenic names anticipating namespaces (Re: A few thoughts)
- Re: rationales for TEI extended-pointer keywords
- Netscape metadata submission to W3C uses XML
- Re: I18N issue needs consideration
- Re: I18N issue needs consideration
- Re: !BEHAVIOR
- Re: NOTATIONS and DATA TYPES (was: Update on namespaces)
- Re: Re PEs
- Re: Comments on Part 1: Asian characters
- Re: Comments on Part 1: Asian characters
- Re: I18N issue needs consideration
- RE: !BEHAVIOR
- Re: Translation of the XML FAQ 1.0
- Re: re i18n
- re i18n
- Re: I18N issue needs consideration
- I18N issue needs consideration
Wednesday, 11 June 1997
- Re: rationales for TEI extended-pointer keywords
- RE: !BEHAVIOR
- Re: RE deleta est
- Re: NOTATIONS and DATA TYPES (was: Update on namespaces)
- USES Notations (was part of Update on namespaces)
- RE: !BEHAVIOR
- USES Notations (was part of Update on namespaces)
- Re: NOTATIONS and DATA TYPES (was: Update on namespaces)
- Re: NOTATIONS and DATA TYPES (was: Update on namespaces)
- A few thoughts
- RE: Update on namespaces
- NOTATIONS and DATA TYPES (was: Update on namespaces)
- Re: Update on namespaces
- Re: Update on namespaces
- Re: Comments on Part 1: Asian characters
- RE: !BEHAVIOR
- re : deleta/enda
- Report on ERB work last week
- RE: !BEHAVIOR
- Re: Re PEs
- Re: Update on namespaces
- Re: RE deleta est
- Re: Invasion of the pseudo-people: character encoding in tedious detail
- Re: Comments on Part 1: Asian characters
- Re: Update on namespaces
- RE: Update on namespaces
- RE: Update on namespaces
- Re: RE deleta est
- Re: Re PEs
- Re: Update on namespaces
- Re: Update on namespaces
- RE: Update on namespaces
- Re: rationales for TEI extended-pointer keywords
- rationales for TEI extended-pointer keywords
Tuesday, 10 June 1997
- RE deleta est
- Re: Valid vs. well formed Documents
- RE: Update on namespaces
- Re: Re PEs
- Re: Update on namespaces
- Re: New work-queue item: Conditional inclusion
- Re: Update on namespaces
- !BEHAVIOR
- RE: Update on namespaces
- RE: Update on namespaces
- Re: Update on namespaces
- Update on namespaces
- Translation of the XML FAQ 1.0
- Re: Invasion of the pseudo-people: character encoding in tedious detail
Monday, 9 June 1997
- Re: Invasion of the pseudo-people: character encoding in tedious detail
- RE: New work-queue item: Conditional inclusion
- Invasion of the pseudo-people: character encoding in tedious detail
- Re: PI->MIME->PI (was Re: Comments on Part 1: Encoding declaration)
- RE: New work-queue item: Conditional inclusion
- Re: Comments on XML Part 1 from Japanese experts
- Valid vs. well formed Documents
- Re: Re WF, V, and MSXML (fwd)
Sunday, 8 June 1997
- Validity and WF
- Re: PI->MIME->PI (was Re: Comments on Part 1: Encoding declaration)
- RE: New work-queue item: Conditional inclusion
Saturday, 7 June 1997
- PI->MIME->PI (was Re: Comments on Part 1: Encoding declaration)
- RE: Comments on XML Part 1 from Japanese experts
- Re: Comments on XML Part 1 from Japanese experts
Friday, 6 June 1997
- Re: KISS (was: Parameter entity references)
- Re: KISS (was: Parameter entity references in WF docs)
- Structure and Behaviour - Formatting and Behaviour
- Re: New work-queue item: Conditional inclusion
- Re: VOTE: Mail list behavior
- Structure and Behaviour - Formatting and Behaviour
- Re: KISS (was: Parameter entity references)
- Re: New work-queue item: Conditional inclusion
- Re: external entities: in LANG or LINK?
- Re: KISS (was: Parameter entity references)
- Re: GROW UP!
- Re: KISS (was: Parameter entity references in WF docs)
- Re: VOTE: Mail list behavior
Thursday, 5 June 1997
- Re: XML and EDI
- VOTE: Mail list behavior
- Re: GROW UP!
- Re: external entities: in LANG or LINK?
- Re: New work-queue item: Conditional inclusion
- Re: GROW UP!
- Re: New work-queue item: Conditional inclusion
- Re: GROW UP!
- Re: GROW UP!
- Re: New work-queue item: Conditional inclusion
- Re: GROW UP!
- Re: New work-queue item: Conditional inclusion
- Re: New work-queue item: Conditional inclusion
- Re: New work-queue item: Conditional inclusion
- Re: GROW UP!
- Re: GROW UP!
- Re: New work-queue item: Conditional inclusion
- Re: New work-queue item: Conditional inclusion
- GROW UP!
- Re: New work-queue item: Conditional inclusion
- Re: New work-queue item: Conditional inclusion
- comments on the xml spec
- Re: New work-queue item: Conditional inclusion
- Re: XML and EDI
- external entities: in LANG or LINK?
- New work-queue item: Conditional inclusion
- Re: KISS (was: Parameter entity references in WF docs)
- Re: XML and EDI
- Re: KISS (was: Parameter entity references in WF docs)
- SHOW="EMBED"
- Re: KISS (was: Parameter entity references in WF docs)
- Re: Re PEs
- Re: KISS (was: Parameter entity references in WF docs)
- Re: KISS (was: Parameter entity references in WF docs)
- Re PEs
- Re: KISS (was: Parameter entity references in WF docs)
- Re: KISS (was: Parameter entity references in WF docs)
Wednesday, 4 June 1997
- Re: KISS (was: Parameter entity references in WF docs)
- Re: External binary entities
- Re: KISS (was: Parameter entity references in WF docs)
- Re: KISS (was: Parameter entity references in WF docs)
- Re: KISS (was: Parameter entity references in WF docs)
- Re: KISS (was: Parameter entity references in WF docs)
- Re: KISS (was: Parameter entity references in WF docs)
- External binary entities
- Re: KISS (was: Parameter entity references in WF docs)
- Re: Comments on Part 1: Encoding declaration
- Re: KISS (was: Parameter entity references in WF docs)
- Re: DTDs and XML conformance
- Re: DTDs and XML conformance
- Re: KISS (was: Parameter entity references in WF docs)
- Re: "Open Interchange"
- Re: KISS (was: Parameter entity references in WF docs)
- Re: KISS (was: Parameter entity references in WF docs)
- Re: DTDs and XML conformance
- Re: KISS (was: Parameter entity references in WF docs)
- Re: Comments on Part 1: Encoding declaration
- Re: KISS (was: Parameter entity references in WF docs)
- Re: KISS (was: Parameter entity references in WF docs)
- Re: KISS (was: Parameter entity references in WF docs)
Tuesday, 3 June 1997
Monday, 2 June 1997
Tuesday, 3 June 1997
- RE: #ANY (was Re: Thoughts on namespaces)
- Re: "Open Interchange"
- Re: KISS (was: Parameter entity references in WF docs)
- Re: KISS (was: Parameter entity references in WF docs)
- Re: "Open Interchange"
- Re: #ANY (was Re: Thoughts on namespaces)
- Re: "Open Interchange"
- Re: Comments on Part 1: Encoding declaration
- RE: Thoughts on namespaces
- #ANY (was Re: Thoughts on namespaces)
- Re: Comments on Part 1: Encoding declaration
- Re: Comments on Part 1: Encoding declaration
- RE: KISS (was: Parameter entity references in WF docs)
- Re: Comments on Part 1: Encoding declaration
- RE: KISS (was: Parameter entity references in WF docs)
- An XML Roadmap (was Re: XS discussion begins)
- Re: "Open Interchange"
- Re: Comments on XML Part 1 from Japanese experts
- Re: Comments on Part 1: Encoding declaration
- Re: "Open Interchange"
- Re: Comments on XML Part 1 from Japanese experts
- Re: KISS (was: Parameter entity references in WF docs)
- Re: KISS (was: Parameter entity references in WF docs)
- Re: "Open Interchange"
- Re: "Open Interchange"
- Structure and Behaviour - Formatting and Behaviour
- Re: Comments on XML Part 1 from Japanese experts
- Re: Comments on Part 1: Asian characters
- Re: Comments on Part 1: Encoding declaration
- Re: "Open Interchange"
- Re: Parameter entity references
- Re: Comments on XML Part 1 from Japanese experts
- Re: KISS (was: Parameter entity references in WF docs)
- RE: Thoughts on namespaces
- Netscape now represented in the XML process
- Re: KISS (was: Parameter entity references in WF docs)
- RE: Thoughts on namespaces
- Re: KISS (was: Parameter entity references in WF docs)
- Re: KISS (was: Parameter entity references in WF docs)
Monday, 2 June 1997
Tuesday, 3 June 1997
Monday, 2 June 1997
- Re: "Open Interchange"
- Re: Comments on XML Part 1 from Japanese experts
- Re: Comments on XML Part 1 from Japanese experts
- "Open Interchange"
- Re: Comments on XML Part 1 from Japanese experts
- Re: Comments on XML Part 1 from Japanese experts
- Re: KISS (was: Parameter entity references in WF docs)
- Re: Comments on XML Part 1 from Japanese experts
- Re: Japanese translation of XML specs
- Japanese translation of XML specs