- From: <lee@sq.com>
- Date: Sun, 15 Jun 97 16:02:46 EDT
- To: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
Jon Bosak wrote: > [...] A stylesheet [may be] associated with an XML document by > inserting into the prolog of the document a processing instruction of > the form > > <?XML-stylesheet type="text/dsssl" href="duckbook.dsl"?> Some quick comments: (1) I assume it can also go in the DTD? (2) It would be very useful to allow a TITLE attribute, so that a user agent such as a browser could display a such as: Styles: Large Print *Standard Grunge (3) Are the type and href keywords case sensitive? > One question that certainly needs resolution is the implied meaning of > multiple stylesheet PIs. > 3. Allow multiple xml-stylesheet PIs but either > > (a) state that the various stylesheets should always be presented as > user options, or > > (b) allow the treatment be completely system-dependent. These are the ones I strongly favour. (a) is of course Panorama's current behaviour. > As for the more complex "binding document" approach, that's on hold > until we can confer with other W3C activities having similar > requirements to see whether we can arrive at one solution that will > work for all of us. I think that's very sensible. Perhaps the Web Collections work will eventually supersede the use of SGML OPEN catalogs, since they are (currently!) in XML, and can carry a wide range of other metadata including certificates, digitial signatures, information on authors, publishers and the generic Dublin Core metadata and so forth. Certainly I expect to see future web browsers use Web Collections... or at any rate, that was the original purpose! Lee
Received on Sunday, 15 June 1997 16:03:09 UTC