- From: Michael Leventhal <michael@textscience.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jun 1997 22:36:34 -0700
- To: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
At 08:51 PM 6/18/97 -0400, Sam Hunting wrote: >Given the potential downside of going with option #3 and getting it wrong >-- however "vociferous" the demand (*not* need, as David points out) for >it might be -- the maximum action to take for 1.0 should be to allow ":" >in names, if need be, and "reserve it for future use" as for as the XML >application profile goes. I've felt for a very long time that SGML needed a "class" mechanism (to me, oddly called here namespaces, but no matter) and that 1. HyTime did not do that properly and 2. that it should not be associated with HyTime but rather be a syntatically smooth part of the element definition syntax. I'm a techie who has tried his hand at teaching SGML and I've picked up some things. You can't teach marked sections because they use a parameter entity and people don't get at all what entities are about. So the conditional markup proposal Tim put out interested me greatly. You can't teach people to class elements with HyTime syntax. Just can't. But oddly, they can easily understand the class/namespace syntax. So I have every reason to like the ':' proposal but I find myself agreeing with the statement above. Is there really real interest to do something with this even before we have fundamental things done like styles? However, although we have an XML tool coming out which does not read the DTD we do not object to having to read the DTD in a future version to pick up attribute definitions which, among other things, might give us namespace associations. But we feel strongly that it should also be a choice - if you don't read the DTD you may lose information but that is the application's and the user of that application's choice. We think that the market will rapidly set the level of interoperability needed and, very likely, we will quickly arrive at the point where most applications will process the DTD in some form or fashion. (Writing DTDs in XML _would_ help.) Michael Leventhal ______________________________________________________________________ Michael Leventhal Internet : http://www.grif.fr G R I F , S. A. Email : Michael.Leventhal@grif.fr VP, Technology Telephone : 510-444-2962 1800 Lake Shore Ave Ste 14 Fax : 510-444-1672 Oakland, California 94606 France : (011) 33 1 30121430 (fr US) ______________________________________________________________________
Received on Thursday, 19 June 1997 10:34:48 UTC