- From: Peter Murray-Rust <Peter@ursus.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Sat, 21 Jun 1997 00:37:52 GMT
- To: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
In message <199706202324.TAA05123@www10.w3.org> Michael Sperberg-McQueen writes: [... Michael also took the trouble to write separately as well, and I think we have a clear understanding...] [...] > > When did these become reasons to *forbid* DTDs to those who do know > how to make them, or who do want to use the DTDs made by others? To make it quite clear, I wasn't suggesting dropping DTDs, but was concerned that the requirement to implement highly complex DTDs (i.e. thousands of lines) required a PE system which some implementers would find too difficult and which wasn't *required* for their much simpler DTDs. [... PE syntax snipped...] I am prepared to take on trust that Michael's new proposal(s) is/are straightforwardly implementable and support the ERB in whatever solution they propose. If it's clearly presented then I think that it's implementable by a webhacker. P. -- Peter Murray-Rust, domestic net connection Virtual School of Molecular Sciences http://www.vsms.nottingham.ac.uk/
Received on Friday, 20 June 1997 19:46:18 UTC