- From: Martin Bryan <mtbryan@sgml.u-net.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jun 1997 12:03:52 +0100
- To: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
- Cc: elm@arbortext.com
At 16:12 14/6/97 -0400, Eve Maler wrote: > Just to complete this picture, I wanted to point out that there > seems to be no good reason to create a linking type for out-of-line > links that point to only one other resource in the syntactic > style of <A>. The creation of out-of-line links assumes enough > sophistication that we don't need the syntactic sugar of making > an entry-level "single" version available. Not true Eve. I might choose to do link managment out-of-line. I might know I want to link a point in a document to some point that is not currently available (say the file is scheduled to be completed next week). How do I indicate that I have a deliberate dangling link? By creating a one resource out-of-line link! At present you model is location+ not (location, location+). Lets leave it that way. ---- Martin Bryan, 29 Oldbury Orchard, Churchdown, Glos. GL3 2PU, UK Phone/Fax: +44 1452 714029 E-mail: mtbryan@sgml.u-net.com For details about The SGML Centre contact http://www.sgml.u-net.com/ For details about the Open Information Interchange initiative contact http://www.echo.lu/oii/en/oiistand.html
Received on Monday, 16 June 1997 07:04:52 UTC