- From: Martin Bryan <mtbryan@sgml.u-net.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jun 1997 09:38:51 +0100
- To: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
At 14:07 19/6/97 -0400, B. Tommie Usdin wrote: . Allowing GI name groups >will not significantly ameliorate the reduction in functionality caused by >the loss of parameter entities. Seconded If you want to simplify PE processing why not just add a semantic contstraint that says that PEs referenced in content models must contain parenthesized name groups? This gives the same processing simplicity/safety and would allow PE's to be used to group declarations by allowing such PEs to also be used in place of element names at the begining of the declaration, without killing off mark section control of DTD fragments. ---- Martin Bryan, 29 Oldbury Orchard, Churchdown, Glos. GL3 2PU, UK Phone/Fax: +44 1452 714029 E-mail: mtbryan@sgml.u-net.com For details about The SGML Centre contact http://www.sgml.u-net.com/ For details about the Open Information Interchange initiative contact http://www.echo.lu/oii/home.html
Received on Friday, 20 June 1997 04:40:34 UTC