Re: Documentation for DTDs (was HDML DTD)

[Note: this message is not cross-posted. I have sent separate copies to
both w3c-sgml-wg and xml-dev listservers. Please be sure you check to which
you are sending in your replies. Post all xml-dev replies to xml-dev@ic.ac.uk]

Jon.Bosak@Eng (Jon Bosak) writes:
> [Peter Murray-Rust:]
> | IMO the additiona of useful documentation to DTDs in a formal manner
> | would be the single most valuable thing that could be done to 'sell'
> | the DTD concept to the new users of XML.  A complex DTD, with or
> | without PEs, with no machine-readable documentation is a turn-off.
> 
> This is out of scope.  Please take futher correspondence on this
> subject elsewhere (e.g., comp.text.sgml).

I agree. Let's move it over to XML-DEV. I've posted the rest of my reply
there.

Murray

...........................................................................
Murray Altheim, SGML Grease Monkey                  <altheim[@]eng.sun.com>
Member of Technical Staff, Tools Development & Support
Sun Microsystems, 2550 Garcia Ave., MS UMPK17-102, Menlo Park, CA 94043 USA
         "Give a monkey the tools and he'll build a typewriter."

Received on Monday, 23 June 1997 14:16:34 UTC