- From: Martin Bryan <mtbryan@sgml.u-net.com>
- Date: Tue, 03 Jun 1997 19:07:47 +0100
- To: <w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org>
At 20:16 3/6/97 +1000, Rick Jelliffe wrote: >To give an example that might make more sense to British-derived readers: > ><!ENTITY Mac SYSTEM > NDATA XML-char > [ xml-role="CHARACTER" > xml-char-name="Ligature for Mac in Scottish Names" > xml-equiv="Mac" > xml-class="letter" > href="gttp://w3.org.uk/glyphs/scotland.font#3" ] >> > >which means: use the "M<sup>c</sup>" glyph if you can retrieve it, otherwise, for sorting etc. use "Mac". > Neat, but why reinent the world? XML will use DSSSL for presentation. Why can't it also use DSSSL for lexicographic ordering and glyph mapping? ---- Martin Bryan, The SGML Centre, Churchdown, Glos. GL3 2PU, UK Phone/Fax: +44 1452 714029 WWW home page: http://www.sgml.u-net.com/
Received on Tuesday, 3 June 1997 14:08:33 UTC