- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jun 1997 15:26:23 -0500
- To: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
David G. Durand wrote: > But none of that would be a candidate for XML 1.0. Every time I see "XML 1.0" I think: 1.0 as opposed to what? Is there some expectation of XML 1.1? 2.0? What features are being put off 'till later? What are the rules for dealing with version numbers other than 1.0? If the XML lanugage is going to evolve, we have to plan for it. Experience with HTML and HTTP shows that alone, if nothing else. The discussion of version numbers in the XML spec[1] should either be expanded to discuss the issue of deployment of new versions or removed altogether. [1] http://www.w3.org/pub/WWW/TR/WD-xml-lang-970331#NT-XMLDecl -- Dan Connolly, Architecture Domain Lead http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 24 June 1997 16:25:46 UTC