- From: len bullard <cbullard@hiwaay.net>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jun 1997 17:10:50 -0500
- To: Andrew Layman <andrewl@microsoft.com>
- CC: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
Andrew Layman wrote: > > As XML stands today, > their meaning is relative to the particular doctype and application > used. Namespaces is a facility to pin down names exactly, in effect > saying "'birthday' as defined by organization x, 'type' as defined by > w3c, 'date' as defined by w3c." That is, as I understand it, what <!NOTATION is for. Why would this not be the preferred way to indicate a formal public identifier in an SGML subset? Is NOTATION carrying baggage? Is there an alternative? len bullard
Received on Tuesday, 10 June 1997 18:11:13 UTC