- From: len bullard <cbullard@hiwaay.net>
- Date: Wed, 04 Jun 1997 21:01:23 -0500
- To: Alex Milowski <lex@www.copsol.com>
- CC: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
Alex Milowski wrote: > > Some will use SGML, others will not. Developers will wonder what we were > thinking not allowing them to include "modules" *in* XML. Why can the doctype itself not be considered a module? > I feel strongly that we should leave them in. > > Simplicity does not always equal functionality. True but it goes a long way toward first pass implementation simplicity and as stated, "training wheels" DTDs. I don't find PEs hard; just rugs for hiding domain messiness. However, I like Dan Connolly's suggestion about functionality beyond "pastie thingies" and think that should be considered before a final decision about PEs is made. This may be a very golden opportunity. len
Received on Wednesday, 4 June 1997 22:01:44 UTC