- From: David G. Durand <dgd@cs.bu.edu>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jun 1997 10:32:53 -0500
- To: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
At 6:03 AM -0500 6/16/97, Martin Bryan wrote: >At 16:12 14/6/97 -0400, Eve Maler wrote: > >> Just to complete this picture, I wanted to point out that there >> seems to be no good reason to create a linking type for out-of-line >> links that point to only one other resource in the syntactic >> style of <A>. The creation of out-of-line links assumes enough >> sophistication that we don't need the syntactic sugar of making >> an entry-level "single" version available. > >Not true Eve. I might choose to do link managment out-of-line. I might know >I want to link a point in a document to some point that is not currently >available (say the file is scheduled to be completed next week). How do I >indicate that I have a deliberate dangling link? By creating a one resource >out-of-line link! At present you model is location+ not (location, >location+). Lets leave it that way. Here's an example close to my heart -- and to some applications or potential applications out there as well. Single-ended out of line links can be used to implement external tagging of documents. This can be useful for marking up read-only unmarked documents, or for recording alternative markup of a single document. Conventions for expressing that semantics for links jhave not yet evolved, but are certainly possible and useful. -- David _________________________________________ David Durand dgd@cs.bu.edu \ david@dynamicDiagrams.com Boston University Computer Science \ Sr. Analyst http://www.cs.bu.edu/students/grads/dgd/ \ Dynamic Diagrams --------------------------------------------\ http://dynamicDiagrams.com/ MAPA: mapping for the WWW \__________________________
Received on Monday, 16 June 1997 10:35:12 UTC