- From: len bullard <cbullard@hiwaay.net>
- Date: Sat, 21 Jun 1997 10:28:12 -0500
- To: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
Weichel Bernhard (K3/EES4) wrote: > But it is understandable to claim (XML) complicated if one is confronted > with this: > > <!ELEMENT sic - - ((((l | lg | p | sp), (((bibl | biblFull | l | lg | > p | sp | cit | q | label | list | listBibl | note | stage))*)) | > ((#PCDATA | ident | code | kw | abbr | address | date | name | num | > rs | time | add | corr | del | gap | orig | reg | sic | unclear | emph > | foreign | gloss | hi | mentioned | soCalled | term | title | ptr | > ref | xptr | xref | anchor | s | seg | gi | formula | eg | bibl | > biblFull | cit | q | label | list | listBibl | note | figure | stage | > table | text)*)))> > > But with: > > <!ELEMENT sic - -(( (%par1; , %part2; ) | %full-text; )*)> > > It looks much simpler - divide an conquer!! This does not remove complexity; it hides it. Then the menus come up with the complete list, and there it is again. The example above is an example of abuse; it is sic. len
Received on Saturday, 21 June 1997 11:28:34 UTC