W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org > June 1997

Re: Parameter entities vs. GI name groups

From: B. Tommie Usdin <btusdin@mulberrytech.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 1997 19:17:10 -0400
Message-Id: <v03007801afd0bea988f7@DialupEudora>
To: "Eve L. Maler" <elm@arbortext.com>
Cc: w3c-sgml-wg@w3.org
Eve L. Maler wrote:
>Having parameter entities for just (1) complete declarations (modules), (2)
>complete model groups (nearly equivalent to GI name groups), and (3)
>keywords for marked sections (switches) greatly impoverishes the set of
>useful PEs.  You don't have PEs for:
>4 Individual attribute specifications (common attributes)
>5 Sets of elements with which you build up repeatable-OR content models
>  ("classes" and "mixtures" in Jeanne's and my methodology)
>6 Other content model subgroups
>7 Other things that are less needful, but still useful
>If I can't have at least 1 through 5, I can't get away with doing
>high-quality, complex production DTDs.

I agree that 1, 2, 3, and 5 are essential to the complex DTD world.  (I
think we can live without 4, although I want it.)

But there's another aspect of PEs that isn't on Eve's list that I feel is
important; the ability to declare them multiple times, and an unambiguous
rule about which over-rides which.  I don't actually care if the first,
last, longest, or cutest is used as long as I can declare several and know
which will be ignored and which active.

-- Tommie

B. Tommie Usdin                     Phone: 301/231-6934
Mulberry Technologies, Inc.           Fax: 301/231-6935
6010 Executive Blvd., Suite 608    E-mail: btusdin@mulberrytech.com
Rockville, MD  20852                  WWW: http://www.mulberrytech.com
Received on Friday, 20 June 1997 19:17:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:25:11 UTC