public-tracking@w3.org from April 2013 by date

Tuesday, 30 April 2013

• Re: Agenda for DNT call, May 1 David Singer
• Re: DAA announcent Rigo Wenning
• Agenda for DNT call, May 1 Peter Swire
• RE: Call for proposals for ISSUE-194 Shane Wiley
• Re: Call for proposals for ISSUE-194 Rob van Eijk
• Call for proposals for ISSUE-194 Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)

Monday, 29 April 2013

• Re: TPE sec 6.11 on clearing granted exceptions David Singer
• DAA announcent Mike O'Neill
• Draft Framework for DNT Discussions, for Monday call Peter Swire
• Call-in information for extra DNT call today at regular time Peter Swire

Sunday, 28 April 2013

• Re: ACTION-390: alternative UA affordances for DNT choice Alan Chapell

Saturday, 27 April 2013

• Re: TPE sec 6.11 on clearing granted exceptions Roy T. Fielding
• Re: DNT extra call this Monday, noon eastern (with apologies for short notice) Nicholas Doty
• Re: TPE sec 6.11 on clearing granted exceptions Nicholas Doty

Friday, 26 April 2013

• RE: Using a standard cookie for opt-in exceptions (was: TPE sec 6.11 on clearing granted exceptions) Mike O'Neill
• RE: Using a standard cookie for opt-in exceptions (was: TPE sec 6.11 on clearing granted exceptions) Shane Wiley
• Re: Using a standard cookie for opt-in exceptions (was: TPE sec 6.11 on clearing granted exceptions) John Simpson
• Re: Using a standard cookie for opt-in exceptions (was: TPE sec 6.11 on clearing granted exceptions) Roy T. Fielding
• Re: publishing working drafts; Status of the Document John Simpson
• Re: publishing working drafts; Status of the Document Nicholas Doty
• Re: Using a standard cookie for opt-in exceptions (was: TPE sec 6.11 on clearing granted exceptions) Nicholas Doty
• Re: Using a standard cookie for opt-in exceptions (was: TPE sec 6.11 on clearing granted exceptions) Rigo Wenning
• Re: publishing working drafts; Status of the Document Roy T. Fielding
• Using a standard cookie for opt-in exceptions (was: TPE sec 6.11 on clearing granted exceptions) Roy T. Fielding
• Re: ACTION-390: alternative UA affordances for DNT choice Alan Chapell
• Re: DNT extra call this Monday, noon eastern (with apologies for short notice) Berin Szoka
• Re: DNT extra call this Monday, noon eastern (with apologies for short notice) Peter Swire
• AW: DNT extra call this Monday, noon eastern (with apologies for short notice) Thomas Schauf
• Re: TPE sec 6.11 on clearing granted exceptions Rigo Wenning
• Re: TPE sec 6.11 on clearing granted exceptions Rigo Wenning
• Re: DNT extra call this Monday, noon eastern (with apologies for short notice) Rigo Wenning
• Re: ACTION-390: alternative UA affordances for DNT choice Rigo Wenning
• Re: ACTION-390: alternative UA affordances for DNT choice Alan Chapell
• Re: publishing working drafts; Status of the Document John Simpson
• Re: ACTION-390: alternative UA affordances for DNT choice Rigo Wenning
• Re: publishing working drafts; Status of the Document John Simpson
• Re: ACTION-390: alternative UA affordances for DNT choice Alan Chapell
• Re: ACTION-390: alternative UA affordances for DNT choice Alan Chapell
• Re: DNT extra call this Monday, noon eastern (with apologies for short notice) Peter Swire
• RE: DNT extra call this Monday, noon eastern (with apologies for short notice) achapell
• Re: DNT extra call this Monday, noon eastern (with apologies for short notice) Peter Swire
• Re: DNT extra call this Monday, noon eastern (with apologies for short notice) Dobbs, Brooks
• DNT extra call this Monday, noon eastern (with apologies for short notice) Peter Swire
• RE: TPE sec 6.11 on clearing granted exceptions Mike O'Neill
• Re: ACTION-258: Propose 'should' for same-party and why Rigo Wenning
• Re: TPE sec 6.11 on clearing granted exceptions David Singer
• Re: TPE sec 6.11 on clearing granted exceptions Roy T. Fielding
• Re: publishing working drafts; Status of the Document Nicholas Doty
• Re: ACTION-390: alternative UA affordances for DNT choice David Singer
• Re: TPE sec 6.11 on clearing granted exceptions David Singer
• Re: ACTION-258: Propose 'should' for same-party and why Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: ACTION-390: alternative UA affordances for DNT choice Rigo Wenning
• Re: ACTION-390: alternative UA affordances for DNT choice Rigo Wenning
• Re: TPE sec 6.11 on clearing granted exceptions Rigo Wenning

Thursday, 25 April 2013

• Re: TPE sec 6.11 on clearing granted exceptions Nicholas Doty
• Re: TPE sec 3 Nicholas Doty
• Re: ACTION-258: Propose 'should' for same-party and why Roy T. Fielding
• Re: ACTION-390: alternative UA affordances for DNT choice Roy T. Fielding
• Re: ACTION-390: alternative UA affordances for DNT choice John Simpson
• Re: ACTION-390: alternative UA affordances for DNT choice Dobbs, Brooks
• Re: ACTION-390: alternative UA affordances for DNT choice Alan Chapell
• Re: ACTION-258: Propose 'should' for same-party and why Rigo Wenning
• Re: ACTION-390: alternative UA affordances for DNT choice Rigo Wenning
• Re: ACTION-390: alternative UA affordances for DNT choice Alan Chapell

Wednesday, 24 April 2013

• OOBC requirements Dan Auerbach
• Re: ISSUE-25: New text for Aggregated data: collection and use for audience measurement research Jeffrey Chester
• op-ed on Do Not Track in Wired this moning Peter Swire
• Re: ISSUE-161: Discussion of semantics and alternatives to "!" Rigo Wenning
• removing notes / highlighting issues Fwd: CVS WWW/2011/tracking-protection/drafts Nicholas Doty
• publishing working drafts; Status of the Document Nicholas Doty
• Apologies John Simpson
• Re: ISSUE-161: Discussion of semantics and alternatives to "!" David Singer
• Re: Wednesday call this week on TPE; schedule leading up to F2F David Singer
• Re: proposed TSV for potential consensus David Singer

Tuesday, 23 April 2013

• Re: Wednesday call this week on TPE; schedule leading up to F2F Peter Swire
• RE: Wednesday call this week on TPE; schedule leading up to F2F SULLIVAN, BRYAN L
• Re: ACTION-258: Propose 'should' for same-party and why Roy T. Fielding
• Re: proposed TSV for potential consent Roy T. Fielding
• Re: proposed TSV for potential consensus Ronan Heffernan
• Re: proposed TSV for potential consensus Rigo Wenning
• Re: Next TPWG f2f meeting May 6-8, 2013 Nicholas Doty
• RE: ACTION-258: Propose 'should' for same-party and why Mike O'Neill
• Re: ACTION-258: Propose 'should' for same-party and why Ronan Heffernan
• Re: ACTION-258: Propose 'should' for same-party and why Rigo Wenning
• RE: ACTION-258: Propose 'should' for same-party and why Adrian Bateman
• Re: proposed TSV for potential consent Ronan Heffernan
• Re: proposed TSV for potential consent Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)
• DNT: Agenda for April 24 DNT Call (focused on TPE) Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)
• Re: proposed TSV for potential consent Rob van Eijk
• Re: proposed TSV for potential consent Rob van Eijk
• Re: ACTION-258: Propose 'should' for same-party and why Rigo Wenning
• Re: ISSUE-25: New text for Aggregated data: collection and use for audience measurement research Jeffrey Chester
• Re: ISSUE-25: New text for Aggregated data: collection and use for audience measurement research Peter Swire
• Wednesday call this week on TPE; schedule leading up to F2F Peter Swire
• ISSUE-25: New text for Aggregated data: collection and use for audience measurement research Kathy Joe
• Re: proposed TSV for potential consent Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)
• Re: proposed TSV for potential consensus Roy T. Fielding
• Re: proposed TSV for potential consent Roy T. Fielding
• Re: proposed TSV for potential consent Ronan Heffernan
• RE: proposed TSV for potential consensus Mike O'Neill
• Re: proposed TSV for potential consent Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)
• Re: proposed TSV for potential consent Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)
• Re: proposed TSV for potential consent Roy T. Fielding
• Re: ACTION-258: Propose 'should' for same-party and why Roy T. Fielding
• Re: proposed TSV for potential consent Rob van Eijk
• proposed TSV for potential consent Roy T. Fielding
• proposed TSV for potential consensus Roy T. Fielding

Monday, 22 April 2013

• RE: ISSUE-161: Discussion of semantics and alternatives to "!" Mike O'Neill
• Re: ISSUE-161: Discussion of semantics and alternatives to "!" Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)
• RE: ISSUE-161: Discussion of semantics and alternatives to "!" Mike O'Neill
• Re: ISSUE-161: Discussion of semantics and alternatives to "!" Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)
• Re: ISSUE-161: Discussion of semantics and alternatives to "!" Roy T. Fielding

Sunday, 21 April 2013

• RE: ISSUE-161: Discussion of semantics and alternatives to "!" Mike O'Neill
• Re: ISSUE-161: Discussion of semantics and alternatives to "!" Rob van Eijk
• Re: ISSUE-161: Discussion of semantics and alternatives to "!" Rob van Eijk
• Re: ISSUE-161: Discussion of semantics and alternatives to "!" Rob van Eijk
• Re: ISSUE-161: Discussion of semantics and alternatives to "!" Rob van Eijk
• Re: ACTION-390: alternative UA affordances for DNT choice David Singer
• Re: ISSUE-161: Discussion of semantics and alternatives to "!" David Singer

Saturday, 20 April 2013

• Re: ACTION-390: alternative UA affordances for DNT choice Alan Chapell
• Re: ISSUE-161: Discussion of semantics and alternatives to "!" Jonathan Mayer
• Re: ISSUE-161: Discussion of semantics and alternatives to "!" David Singer
• Re: ACTION-390: alternative UA affordances for DNT choice David Singer

Friday, 19 April 2013

• Re: ACTION-390: alternative UA affordances for DNT choice Alan Chapell
• Re: ISSUE-161: Discussion of semantics and alternatives to "!" Jonathan Mayer
• Re: ACTION-390: alternative UA affordances for DNT choice David Singer
• Re: ISSUE-161: Discussion of semantics and alternatives to "!" David Singer

Thursday, 18 April 2013

• Re: ISSUE-161: Discussion of semantics and alternatives to "!" Jonathan Mayer
• Re: ACTION-390: alternative UA affordances for DNT choice Alan Chapell
• Re: ACTION-390: alternative UA affordances for DNT choice David Singer
• Re: ACTION-390: alternative UA affordances for DNT choice David Singer
• Re: Issue-119 TSV "N" value David Singer
• Re: TPE sec 6.11 on clearing granted exceptions David Singer
• Re: NOTE on cookies in Section 4.2 David Singer
• Re: ISSUE-161: Discussion of semantics and alternatives to "!" David Singer

Wednesday, 17 April 2013

• Re: ISSUE-161: Discussion of semantics and alternatives to "!" Jonathan Mayer
• Re: FTC Chairwoman Edith Ramirez's speech Chris Mejia
• Re: FTC Chairwoman Edith Ramirez's speech John Simpson
• Re: FTC Chairwoman Edith Ramirez's speech Dobbs, Brooks
• Re: FTC Chairwoman Edith Ramirez's speech Rob van Eijk
• FTC Chairwoman Edith Ramirez's speech John Simpson
• Re: compliance section 2: scope & goals Ronan Heffernan
• compliance section 2: scope & goals Aleecia M. McDonald
• TPE sec 3 Rob van Eijk
• TPE sec 1 Rob van Eijk
• TPE sec 6.11 on clearing granted exceptions Roy T. Fielding
• Re: ACTION-390: alternative UA affordances for DNT choice Peter Cranstone
• NOTE on cookies in Section 4.2 Nicholas Doty
• Re: ACTION-390: alternative UA affordances for DNT choice Dobbs, Brooks
• TPE diff since last WD Roy T. Fielding
• Re: ACTION-390: alternative UA affordances for DNT choice Chris Mejia
• Re: ACTION-390: alternative UA affordances for DNT choice David Wainberg
• Fwd: Moving "C"onsent from Tracking Status to Permitted Use? Nicholas Doty
• Re: ACTION-390: alternative UA affordances for DNT choice Chris Mejia
• Re: ACTION-390: alternative UA affordances for DNT choice Edward W. Felten
• Swire personal update -- Georgia Tech Peter Swire
• Re: ACTION-390: alternative UA affordances for DNT choice David Wainberg
• Re: ACTION-390: alternative UA affordances for DNT choice Alan Chapell
• Re: ACTION-390: alternative UA affordances for DNT choice Edward W. Felten
• Re: ACTION-390: alternative UA affordances for DNT choice ("threats") Peter Swire
• Re: ACTION-390: alternative UA affordances for DNT choice Peter Swire
• Re: ACTION-390: alternative UA affordances for DNT choice Alan Chapell
• Re: ACTION-390: alternative UA affordances for DNT choice Edward W. Felten
• RE: ACTION-390: alternative UA affordances for DNT choice SULLIVAN, BRYAN L
• Re: ACTION-390: alternative UA affordances for DNT choice David Wainberg
• Re: ACTION-390: alternative UA affordances for DNT choice Alan Chapell
• Re: ACTION-390: alternative UA affordances for DNT choice Dobbs, Brooks
• Re: ACTION-390: alternative UA affordances for DNT choice Alan Chapell
• Re: ACTION-390: alternative UA affordances for DNT choice Peter Swire
• Issue-119 TSV "N" value David Wainberg
• ACTION-390: alternative UA affordances for DNT choice Edward W. Felten
• Re: DNT:Agenda for April 17 DNT Call David Singer
• Re: ISSUE-161: Discussion of semantics and alternatives to "!" Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)
• Re: ISSUE-161: Discussion of semantics and alternatives to "!" (was: Batch closing) Roy T. Fielding
• Re: ISSUE-161: Discussion of semantics and alternatives to "!" (was: Batch closing) David Singer
• Re: ISSUE-161: Discussion of semantics and alternatives to "!" (was: Batch closing) Jonathan Mayer
• Re: ISSUE-161: Discussion of semantics and alternatives to "!" (was: Batch closing) Roy T. Fielding

Tuesday, 16 April 2013

• Fwd: Moving "C"onsent from Tracking Status to Permitted Use? Justin Brookman
• questions, Re: ISSUE-25: New text for Aggregated data: collection and use for audience measurement research Jeffrey Chester
• DNT:Agenda for April 17 DNT Call Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)
• tracking-ISSUE-195: Flows and signals for handling out of band consent [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker
• Fwd: Re: Moving "C"onsent from Tracking Status to Permitted Use? Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)
• Re: ISSUE-161: Discussion of semantics and alternatives to "!" Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)
• Re: ISSUE-161: Discussion of semantics and alternatives to "!" David Singer
• Re: Next Public TCS Working Draft and non-normative text Peter Swire

Monday, 15 April 2013

• Re: ISSUE-161: Discussion of semantics and alternatives to "!" Jonathan Mayer
• Next Public TCS Working Draft and non-normative text John Simpson
• Re: DNT: Agenda for April 10 call Alan Chapell
• Re: ISSUE-161: Discussion of semantics and alternatives to "!" Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)
• RE: Batch closing of TPE-related issues (response by April 16) Mike O'Neill
• Re: Batch closing of TPE-related issues (response by April 16) Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)
• ISSUE-161: Discussion of semantics and alternatives to "!" (was: Batch closing) Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)
• Re: Issue maintenance for the TPE spec David Singer
• Re: DNT: Agenda for April 10 call Rigo Wenning

Sunday, 14 April 2013

• RE: Issue maintenance for the TPE spec Shane Wiley
• RE: DNT: Agenda for April 10 call Mike O'Neill

Saturday, 13 April 2013

• Re: Moving "C"onsent from Tracking Status to Permitted Use? Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Moving "C"onsent from Tracking Status to Permitted Use? Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Discuss: Closing ISSUE-152? Feedback for out of band consent Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Issue maintenance for the TPE spec Roy T. Fielding
• Re: DNT: Agenda for April 10 call Rigo Wenning

Friday, 12 April 2013

• Re: Batch closing of TPE-related issues (response by April 16) John Simpson
• Re: Batch closing of TPE-related issues (response by April 16) Jonathan Mayer
• Re: Batch closing of TPE-related issues (response by April 16) David Wainberg
• RE: Batch closing of TPE-related issues (response by April 16) Mike O'Neill
• Discuss: Closing ISSUE-152? Feedback for out of band consent Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)
• Batch closing of TPE-related issues (response by April 16) Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)
• Issue maintenance for the TPE spec Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)
• Re: Closing ISSUE-187 by focusing our discussion on consent standard (ISSUE-194) [Response required by Monday April 15] Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)

Thursday, 11 April 2013

• Re: Closing ISSUE-187 by focusing our discussion on consent standard (ISSUE-194) [Response required by Monday April 15] Jonathan Mayer
• Re: Moving "C"onsent from Tracking Status to Permitted Use? Nicholas Doty
• Re: DNT: Agenda for April 10 call Sid Stamm
• Re: DNT: Agenda for April 10 call Alan Chapell
• Re: DNT: Agenda for April 10 call Sid Stamm
• Closing ISSUE-187 by focusing our discussion on consent standard (ISSUE-194) [Response required by Monday April 15] Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)

Wednesday, 10 April 2013

• Re: DNT: Agenda for April 10 call David Singer
• Re: DNT: Agenda for April 10 call David Singer
• Re: Down-scoping / narrowing of ISSUE-187: Right approach to exceptions Jonathan Mayer
• Re: ACTION-373 Append: background memo on append and related topics Kathy Joe
• Re: DNT: Agenda for April 10 call Dan Auerbach
• Re: DNT: Agenda for April 10 call Aleecia M. McDonald
• Down-scoping / narrowing of ISSUE-187: Right approach to exceptions Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)
• RE: DNT: Agenda for April 10 call Adrian Bateman
• ACTION-374: Suggest how redirection proposals can factor in to the first party definition Nicholas Doty
• Re: user interface/user education Nicholas Doty
• Re: user interface/user education Nicholas Doty
• tracking-ISSUE-194 (user education): How should we address user education about DNT? Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker

Tuesday, 9 April 2013

• Re: DNT: Agenda for April 10 call Jonathan Mayer
• Re: DNT: Agenda for April 10 call Alan Chapell
• Re: DNT: Agenda for April 10 call Jonathan Mayer
• Re: DNT: Agenda for April 10 call Justin Brookman
• Re: DNT: Agenda for April 10 call Jonathan Mayer
• Re: DNT: Agenda for April 10 call Alan Chapell
• Re: DNT: Agenda for April 10 call Justin Brookman
• Re: DNT: Agenda for April 10 call Berin Szoka
• DNT: Agenda for April 10 call Peter Swire
• ACTION-373 Append: background memo on append and related topics Peter Swire
• Re: ACTION-373 Append: Issues list based on today's call Jeffrey Chester

Monday, 8 April 2013

• Re: ACTION-373 Append: Issues list based on today's call John Simpson

Thursday, 4 April 2013

• Re: Moving "C"onsent from Tracking Status to Permitted Use? David Singer
• Re: Moving "C"onsent from Tracking Status to Permitted Use? Roy T. Fielding

Wednesday, 3 April 2013

• Re: Moving "C"onsent from Tracking Status to Permitted Use? David Singer
• ACTION-373 Append: Issues list based on today's call Peter Swire
• RE: de-identification text for Wednesday's call Mike O'Neill
• Re: ACTION-273/ISSUE-181: Multiple First Parties John Simpson
• Re: de-identification text for Wednesday's call Dobbs, Brooks
• Re: Explicit list of ad network who supports DNT:1 header? イアンフェッティ
• de-identification text for Wednesday's call Mike O'Neill
• Re: Explicit list of ad network who supports DNT:1 header? Aleecia M. McDonald
• RE: Data append?-transactional? Shane Wiley
• DNT:Agenda for April 3 call with updated text Peter Swire
• RE: Action 368 - Definition of Service Provider/Data Processor Chris Pedigo
• RE: de-identification text for Wednesday's call Shane Wiley
• user interface/user education Alan Chapell
• Re: de-identification text for Wednesday's call Justin Brookman
• Re: Data append?-transactional? Rob van Eijk
• ACTION:371, Re: de-identification text for Wednesday's call Peter Swire
• Re: ACTION-273/ISSUE-181: Multiple First Parties Peter Swire
• Re: de-identification text for Wednesday's call Roy T. Fielding

Tuesday, 2 April 2013

• Explicit list of ad network who supports DNT:1 header? Kenny Yuze Lang

Wednesday, 3 April 2013

• Re: de-identification text for Wednesday's call Dan Auerbach
• RE: de-identification text for Wednesday's call Shane Wiley
• RE: de-identification text for Wednesday's call Shane Wiley
• ACTION-273/ISSUE-181: Multiple First Parties Rob Sherman
• RE: de-identification text for Wednesday's call Justin Brookman

Tuesday, 2 April 2013

• Re: de-identification text for Wednesday's call Dan Auerbach
• RE: de-identification text for Wednesday's call Shane Wiley
• Re: de-identification text for Wednesday's call Thomas Roessler
• Re: de-identification text for Wednesday's call Dan Auerbach
• RE: de-identification text for Wednesday's call Shane Wiley
• Re: de-identification text for Wednesday's call Thomas Roessler
• RE: de-identification text for Wednesday's call Shane Wiley
• RE: de-identification text for Wednesday's call Shane Wiley
• Re: de-identification text for Wednesday's call Dan Auerbach
• Re: de-identification text for Wednesday's call John Simpson
• RE: de-identification text for Wednesday's call Amy Colando (LCA)
• RE: de-identification text for Wednesday's call Shane Wiley
• RE: de-identification text for Wednesday's call Shane Wiley
• Re: de-identification text for Wednesday's call Dan Auerbach
• Re: on conformance John Simpson
• Re: de-identification text for Wednesday's call Dan Auerbach
• Re: Data append?-transactional? Alan Chapell
• RE: de-identification text for Wednesday's call Shane Wiley
• RE: de-identification text for Wednesday's call Mike O'Neill
• Re: de-identification text for Wednesday's call Dobbs, Brooks
• RE: de-identification text for Wednesday's call Shane Wiley
• RE: de-identification text for Wednesday's call Shane Wiley
• RE: de-identification text for Wednesday's call Mike O'Neill
• DNT:Agenda for April 3 call Peter Swire
• Re: de-identification text for Wednesday's call Dobbs, Brooks
• RE: Data append?-transactional? Shane Wiley
• RE: de-identification text for Wednesday's call Shane Wiley
• RE: de-identification text for Wednesday's call Shane Wiley
• Re: de-identification text for Wednesday's call Dobbs, Brooks
• RE: on conformance Frank.Dawson@nokia.com
• Re: Data append?-transactional? Jeffrey Chester
• on conformance Thomas Roessler
• de-identification text for Wednesday's call Dan Auerbach
• RE: Data append? Shane Wiley

Monday, 1 April 2013

• Re: Data append? John Simpson
• Re: Data append? John Simpson
• DNT: preliminary agenda for Wednesday April 3 Peter Swire
• Re: Data append? Alan Chapell
• Re: Data append? Alan Chapell
• Re: Data append? Chris Pedigo
• RE: Data append? Shane Wiley
• Data append? John Simpson

Last message date: Tuesday, 30 April 2013 22:57:46 UTC